« Return to Thread: Conformance of literals to attached arguments

Re: Conformance of literals to attached arguments

by Eric Bezault :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> I just came across this:
>
> Error code: VUAR(2)
> Type error: non-conforming actual argument in feature call.
> What to do: make sure that type of actual argument conforms to type
>   of corresponding formal argument.
>
> Class: ST_TEST_ST_STRING

I would have called the test just ST_TEST_STRING. It's the "STRING"
class from the library "ST".

--
Eric Bezault
mailto:ericb@...
http://www.gobosoft.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
gobo-eiffel-develop mailing list
gobo-eiffel-develop@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gobo-eiffel-develop

 « Return to Thread: Conformance of literals to attached arguments