On 06/16/2008 04:37 PM, Pippijn van Steenhoven wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:07:40PM -0400, Bill Page wrote:
>>> svn://svn.xinutec.org/aldor/trunk
>> This links seems dead.
>
> It's not, but it is not a HTTP URL.
> svn co svn://svn.xinutec.org/aldor/trunk
> should work (and works for me). Note that I am currently just importing
> the aldor sources and trying to find a good way of doing so.
Does *not* work for me. Well, isn't there a way in SVN to use 'external
sources' so that your repository would never contain the Aldor source
tree, but only a reference to it? So the question of distribution would
be settled.
>> I think the answer is "yes". Provided that you are not re-distributing
>> a modified version of Aldor under a different license, I do not think
>> that there is any problem to make aldor-related source code separately
>> available under what ever license you choose. (If I am wrong about
> I am not going to re-distribute anything, I am just providing sources. In
> fact, the source tree is not a "work", is it? I mean, if I mix GPL
> sources with APL2 sources in the same source tree, that does not mean the
> entire source tree has to be GPL, does it? My repository does not form a
> "work", it should be seen as loosely coupled collection of sources. Is
> that possible?
What about a mail to the FSF? Make the problem clear and hope they
suggest something reasonable. They should know best about the GPL.
Ralf
_______________________________________________
Aldor-l mailing list
Aldor-l@...
http://aldor.org/mailman/listinfo/aldor-l_aldor.org
