2008/4/29 Colin Adams <
colinpauladams@...>:
> On 21/04/2008, Eric Bezault <
ericb@...> wrote:
>
>> After looking at class UC_STRING, I'm wondering whether we should
>> just adapt the routines `make_from_string' and `make_from_substring'
>> so that we can pass a STRING_GENERAL. Perhaps we will have to
>> rename the version of `make_from_string' inherited from STRING.
>> Or add `make_from_string_general', `make_from_substring_general',
>> make `make_from_substring' obsolete (make it call
>> `make_from_substring_general') and modify `make_from_string'
>> to call `make_from_string_general'. I'm not sure what the best
>> naming convention is.
>
> I think the last suggestion (adding make_from_string_general and
> changing make_from_string to call make_from_string_general, etc.) is
> best.
>
Shall we do this then?
I've just this minute encountered the need for it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/_______________________________________________
gobo-eiffel-develop mailing list
gobo-eiffel-develop@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gobo-eiffel-develop