« Return to Thread: Clusters
Stefan Guggisberg-2 wrote:hi perry
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Perry.yin <perry.yin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,stefan:
> I got a jackrabbit clustering issue: Content created by one tomcat is not
> visible for another tomcat. Would you like to give me your configuration as
> a sample?
i don't have a cluster setup, sorry. you can find more information
about configuring
cluster support here: http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Clustering
cheers
stefan
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
> Stefan Guggisberg wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 16, 2008 7:33 PM, Connor Brett <ConnorB@axxia.com> wrote:
> >> I'm embarrassed to say my search problem is solved - I forgot to edit
> >> the node name in the cluster config!
> >
> > no problem, thanks for reporting back! :)
> >
> > cheers
> > stefan
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Connor Brett [mailto:ConnorB@AXXIA.com]
> >> Sent: 16 January 2008 17:01
> >> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
> >>
> >> Subject: RE: Clusters
> >>
> >> Thanks, that's good news. What Jackrabbit version you are using? I don't
> >> see anything that stands out in our logs, no errors or warnings anyway.
> >> I haven't examined the entire log to look for the presense of
> >> re-indexing on other nodes. Is there anything I should be looking for,
> >> or any extra configuration I need to do for this to work?
> >>
> >> There's no evidence of index corruption - each cluster node can
> >> successfully find document nodes that _it_ added. We have in the past
> >> had the need to drop and re-create the indexes. In my test environment I
> >> started with a brand new repository so all cluster nodes have created
> >> their own local file system indexes.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your help.
> >> Brett
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Alessandro Bologna [mailto:alessandro.bologna@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: 16 January 2008 16:49
> >> To: users@jackrabbit.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Clusters
> >>
> >> Regarding point 2, I can tell you that searching *does* work across
> >> clusters. When a clustered server adds, deletes or updates a JCR node,
> >> it writes a record in the journal table and the other servers are
> >> notified and they update their local lucene indexes. Those indexes need
> >> not to be on a shared filesystem.
> >>
> >> Sometimes we experimented a situation where the local indexes (stored on
> >> the filesystem, under repository/workspaces/<name>/index) on a server
> >> may have become corrupted, and that leads to queries returning no nodes.
> >> In those cases, it was enough to stop the server that fails, delete the
> >> contents of the index directory, and restart it. Indexes are
> >> regenerated, and it picks up any new change that has happened while it
> >> was down.
> >> Do you see anything weird in your logs?
> >>
> >> Alessandro
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 16, 2008 10:17 AM, Connor Brett <ConnorB@axxia.com> wrote:
> >> > We trying clusters with Jackrabbit 1.3.3, and I have a couple of
> >> > questions / issues:
> >> >
> >> > 1) journal database connection recovery - if / when the database is
> >> > offline the journal connection is never recovered, and errors are
> >> > repeatedly logged. Document operations seem to continue - errors are
> >> > logged but no exceptions are thrown. Nodes in the cluster are
> >> > presumably out of sync now. Does anyone know if this is recovered
> >> > cleanly next time the nodes restart or whether this is permanently
> >> > bad? I don't like even asking the question, but I'm being pressured to
> >>
> >> > hold off upgrading to
> >> > 1.4 at present.
> >> >
> >> > 2) searching doesn't seem to work over clusters, eg. add a document in
> >>
> >> > NODE-1, search for the document in NODE-1 works, search with the same
> >> > query in NODE-2 and the document is not found. The lucene indexes seem
> >>
> >> > to be in the local file system always, I can't find any other
> >> > configuration. Is there a way for the clusters to either share the
> >> > indexes or for JR to update the indexes from the journalled changes?
> >> > Does 1.4 change this (I didn't see anything in the release notes about
> >>
> >> > it)?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Brett
> >>
> >> E-MAIL DISCLAIMER
> >> The information in this e-mail and any attachment is confidential. It is
> >> intended only for the named recipient(s). If you are not a named
> >> recipient please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the
> >> contents to another person or take copies. Although Axxia Systems has
> >> taken every reasonable precaution to ensure that any attachment to this
> >> e-mail has been checked for viruses,it is strongly recommended that you
> >> carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment, as we
> >> cannot accept liability for any damage sustained as a result of software
> >> virus infection. Axxia Systems reserves the right to monitor and record
> >> e-mails sent to axxia.com, and senders of such messages shall be taken to
> >> consent to this.
> >> Registered Office: Axxia House, Unit 4, The Pavilions, Ruscombe Business
> >> Park, Twyford, Berkshire, RG10 9NN. Registration Number: 3019229
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Clusters-tp14884942p17269979.html
> Sent from the Jackrabbit - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
« Return to Thread: Clusters
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |