« Return to Thread: Bug in 3.0.1's betainc function (was Re: [OctDev] More than just an inconvenience Re: But in t_cdf: sporadic zero's when "no need")

Re: Bug in 3.0.1's betainc function (was Re: [OctDev] More than just an inconvenience Re: But in t_cdf: sporadic zero's when "no need")

by dbateman :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

John W. Eaton wrote:

On 13-May-2008, David Bateman wrote:

| Then this is an issue with the underlying SLATEC function dbetai, the
| only sensible way I see of fixing this is to replace it with the gsl
| functions, and in that case lots of other functions in Octave should get
| the same treatment.

I think this should be a goal for 3.2.

jwe

By 3.2 do you mean in the current unstable release 3.1 that will become the next stable release or after the next stable release?

D.

« Return to Thread: Bug in 3.0.1's betainc function (was Re: [OctDev] More than just an inconvenience Re: But in t_cdf: sporadic zero's when "no need")