« Return to Thread: Bug in 3.0.1's betainc function (was Re: [OctDev] More than just an inconvenience Re: But in t_cdf: sporadic zero's when "no need")

Re: Bug in 3.0.1's betainc function (was Re: [OctDev] More than just an inconvenience Re: But in t_cdf: sporadic zero's when "no need")

by John W. Eaton :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

On 19-May-2008, dbateman wrote:

| By 3.2 do you mean in the current unstable release 3.1 that will become the
| next stable release or after the next stable release?

Not the next stable release, but the one after, unless someone
convinces me that it should have a much higher priority.

jwe
_______________________________________________
Bug-octave mailing list
Bug-octave@...
https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/bug-octave

 « Return to Thread: Bug in 3.0.1's betainc function (was Re: [OctDev] More than just an inconvenience Re: But in t_cdf: sporadic zero's when "no need")

LightInTheBox - Buy quality products at wholesale price