> I loaded up the current, release of pier, and it is very clean and
> ready
> to be styled.
You can either build on top of blueprint (I know of many Pier pages
that have done exactly this) or remove it an use your own things
(there are quite a couple of pages here as well).
> I miss the tree view, has it gone because it doesnt fit in
> the layout?
The tree is still there as a widget. So you can just add it. I removed
it from the default layout, as its usability is very limited and I
think it should be generally avoided. In my opinion the tree is only
good to manage and organize the site, therefor I often add it for
admins only.
> Blueprint looks cool for some applications. I have one site which
> has a
> fairly fixed layout, so blueprint appears to me to be an ideal
> solution
> for that, but not, I fear for pier in general.
>
> This appears to me to be a better fit, for general blogish/corporate
> sites.
>
>
http://www.contentwithstyle.co.uk/Articles/17/a-css-framework/I don't see much difference, except that this CSS framework is a bit
at a different leven. It provides 6 different layouts and seems to me
a bit limited. However there is nothing that prevents you from using
it in Pier: remove blueprintcss, add contentwithstyle, done.
Lukas
--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch_______________________________________________
SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki
