On 24/04/2008, Daniel Tuser <
dan.tuser@...> wrote:
> > Some of the routines are too long to read on the screen.
> >
> >
> I don't like that as well. Those are the algorithms that could also be
> implemented as recursive features. I will see what I can do to improve that.
> But I will not make them recursive.
> A splitting into more features is also not easy as some features would
> require about 4 or 5 arguments. I was already working on that but stopped
> because the resulting code was not more readable. It could be done using
> attributes. But it would take some time.
> Do you think that has to be changed?
I would say yes, provided there is no significant performance impact.
I don't think passing 5 arguments is a reason not to do it, as the
routines receiving 5 arguments are all secret.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone_______________________________________________
gobo-eiffel-develop mailing list
gobo-eiffel-develop@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gobo-eiffel-develop
