Is the first section (included below) intended for the board report,
or board@ commentary?
Hen
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Noel J. Bergman <
noel@...> wrote:
> As previously noted, CXF is proposing to graduate as a TLP. The resolution
> has been submitted to the Board. QPid withdrew its proposal, in light of
> the fairly strong line that the Incubator PMC is taking on diversity. There
> was some unfortunate public airing of affiliations, but I believe that the
> lesson of discussing people on private lists instead of in public has been
> learned.
>
> The Incubator PMC's experience has been that projects are more often focused
> on getting good code done than in preparing to have a diverse PMC, and that
> the issue is significant enough to warrant that we emphasize the need to
> focus on that diversity. CXF and Tuscany have both been pushed in that
> direction previously, and have reported great satisfaction with the end
> result. Quoting from CXF: "spending additional time in the Incubator to
> increase diversity, despite initial resistence, turned out to be very
> helpful and the right thing."
>
> Tuscany is discussing graduation again, and although Tuscany is not due to
> report this month, they provided an interim report on their own initiative
> regarding their status, which I am including in this month's report. I
> won't speak for the Incubator PMC, as we haven't discussed Tuscany's report,
> but will indicate my own satisfaction at what I read.
>
> Other than that, pretty much the usual: projects working towards Incubator
> releases, such as Abdera, Tuscany, and UIMA; projects clearing IP;
> clarification of procedures; etc.
>
> We've reiterate to projects that if Confluence is being used to generate
> their web site, the people with edit rights must have a signed CLA on file.
>
> --- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
general-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
general-help@...