On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Gerolf Seitz <
gerolf.seitz@...> wrote:
> hi,
>
> i was wondering whether we should conform to the original RFCs or the
> latest bis revisions (and somehow treat the bis revisions as approved RFCs)?
> as we're in labs, we could go with the 'bleeding edge' ;)
>
> however, the order of the sections have changed compared to the original
> RFCs.
> eg. resource binding: RFC3920:7 vs. RFC3920bis-04:8
>
> so i'd rather stick to the original (exclusive) or to the latest bis
> revision, to avoid
> confusion as to which revision is used, etc...
>
> my vote would be +1 for the latest bis revision :)
this has my sympathy. yet I don't know what that buys us. 3920f is
what all the clients and servers out there are coded against.
We _have_ to comply to them if we want to be interoperable. The diff
is not too big I think, so that should be no big deal complying to
both, RFCs and BISs.
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
labs-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
labs-help@...
