Jakub,
Since you are an honorary gfortran maintainer, at very least, your OK
is good enough:-) That said, thanks for letting us know.
Cheers
Paul
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Jakub Jelinek <
jakub@...> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 05:44:32AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> The use of different types depending on whether we're issuing debug
>> information or not caused -fcompare-debug differences. IIRC, they had
>> to do with aliasing differences. I don't remember having found any
>> case in which generated code was actually different, rather than some
>> harmless difference in dumps, but why take risks?
>
> The code is different on the trunk, but I agree with leaving the
> write_symbols == NO_DEBUG check out. That said, some Fortran maintainer
> needs to approve it.
>
>> for gcc/ChangeLog.vta
>> from Alexandre Oliva <
aoliva@...>
>>
>> * fortran/trans-types.c (gfc_get_nodesc_array_type): Don't
>> vary types depending on debug info.
>>
>> Index: gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- gcc/fortran/trans-types.c.orig 2008-07-29 18:37:48.000000000 -0300
>> +++ gcc/fortran/trans-types.c 2008-09-20 18:45:19.000000000 -0300
>> @@ -1415,10 +1415,10 @@ gfc_get_nodesc_array_type (tree etype, g
>> mpz_clear (stride);
>> mpz_clear (delta);
>>
>> - /* In debug info represent packed arrays as multi-dimensional
>> - if they have rank > 1 and with proper bounds, instead of flat
>> - arrays. */
>> - if (known_offset && write_symbols != NO_DEBUG)
>> + /* Represent packed arrays as multi-dimensional if they have rank >
>> + 1 and with proper bounds, instead of flat arrays. This makes for
>> + better debug info. */
>> + if (known_offset)
>> {
>> tree gtype = etype, rtype, type_decl;
>>
>
> Jakub
>
--
The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.
--Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
