Re: [squeak-dev] Re: Renaming "Squeak"

> I think we should rename it to:
>
> "The Programming Language formally known as Squeak"
>
> :-)
>
> David
>
>
> Quoting tim Rowledge <tim@...>:
>
> > How is Squeak notably less serious as a name than
> > java
> > ruby
> > BASIC
> > Pascal
> > SNOBOL
> > lisp
> > etc?
> >
> > And why would I have any respect for a business that declines to use a  
> > software system purely on the basis of the name anyway?
> >
> > tim
> > --
> > tim Rowledge; tim@...; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> > Strange OpCodes: HEM: Hide Evidence of Malfunction
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>