« Return to Thread: [squeak-dev] Renaming "Squeak"
Re: [squeak-dev] Re: Renaming "Squeak"
by Ken Causey
::
Rate this Message:
+1
Ken
P.S. How about spending time writing some useful code instead?
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 16:37 -0800, tim Rowledge wrote:
> How is Squeak notably less serious as a name than
> java
> ruby
> BASIC
> Pascal
> SNOBOL
> lisp
> etc?
>
> And why would I have any respect for a business that declines to use a
> software system purely on the basis of the name anyway?
>
> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; tim@...; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Strange OpCodes: HEM: Hide Evidence of Malfunction
>
>
>
>
Ken
P.S. How about spending time writing some useful code instead?
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 16:37 -0800, tim Rowledge wrote:
> How is Squeak notably less serious as a name than
> java
> ruby
> BASIC
> Pascal
> SNOBOL
> lisp
> etc?
>
> And why would I have any respect for a business that declines to use a
> software system purely on the basis of the name anyway?
>
> tim
> --
> tim Rowledge; tim@...; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Strange OpCodes: HEM: Hide Evidence of Malfunction
>
>
>
>
signature.asc (196 bytes) « Return to Thread: [squeak-dev] Renaming "Squeak"
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
