On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Don Brown <
mrdon@...> wrote:
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [X] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
I don't think it is stable enough for a GA (and there are apparent
licensing issues I guess), but I think it is good enough to be BETA
and to get into our user's hands for more testing. Unless there are
huge legal issues or show-stopping stability problems, we need to be
getting these releases out to our community or we will never get a GA
build. Remember, beta means it is feature complete but there are
known issues, and I think that is what we have here.
Don
o
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> Don
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
