Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.2-incubating

> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> > On Friday 11 April 2008, Adam Lally wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:10 AM, sebb <sebbaz@...> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 11/04/2008, Michael Baessler <mba@...> wrote:
> > > >  > sebb wrote:
> > > >  >  > Problem building uimaj:
> > > >  >  >
> > > >  >  > 1) javax.activation:activation:jar:1.0.2
> > > >
> > > >  Unfortunately only the POM and metadata are present in the M2 repo
> > > > for that version - the jar is not present. I raised a JIRA issue for
> > > > this:
> > > >
> > > >  http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-2014
> > > >
> > > This is because Sun's license prevents this jar from being
> > > redistributed from the central Maven repository:
> > >
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-coping-with-sun-jars.html
> > >
> > > In the build instructions on the UIMA website, we describe how to
> > > obtain the jar yourself and add it to your local Maven repo:
> > >
> http://incubator.apache.org/uima/svn.html#building.command.line
> > >
> >
> > Any particular reason you don't exclude this dependency in you poms and
> then pull in a version that IS available.  Either the 1.1 version from
> java.net:
> > http://download.java.net/maven/1/javax.activation/jars/
> >
> > or the geronimo-specs version available at central:
> > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/specs/
> >
> > (In general, I prefer the geronimo specs versions, but it doesn't really
> matter)
> >
> >
>
>  If that works, it'll be vastly preferable to the manual do-hicky
>  we have now.  We'll follow up on uima-dev.
>

>  Thanks,
>  Thilo
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> general-unsubscribe@...
>  For additional commands, e-mail:
> general-help@...
>
>