Mads Toftum wrote:
> GPG will most likely be added to the mix as well given the planned
> design, but other than that I think that'll be ok. I was looking at the
> notice for httpd earlier and that one deviates from what BadCA needs
> because crypto isn't optional here.
Yes - it is a little different, and if we bind later to some libgpg we
can address it then.
> As for the bit about the crypto living on an obscure branch of apr, that
> wasn't the case last time BadCA was active - at that point the code was
> in trunk.
Right, I was just making the observation that apr is still on the hook
even though it isn't a shipping product, and for BadCA I hope we do finally
round out the API to satisfy the objections from dev@apr (and ship a 1.4.0
officially that BadCA can consume).
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
labs-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
labs-help@...
