Re: [Slightly OT] Stability of Squeak

> I've not noticed a particular increase in image size, myself. The  
> semaphore
> fixes posted in the dev-list have worked wonders for the stability  
> of our
> client's software... AFAIK they'll be put into 3.10 but must be  
> installed
> manualy for 3.9.
>
> There was a post somewhre in the ui list about unrecoverable  
> garbage. After
> my last respone there has been no feeback, however.

>
>
> Regards, Gary,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ui-bounces@...
>> [mailto:ui-bounces@...]On Behalf Of Bill  
>> Schwab
>> Sent: 01 November 2007 2:31 AM
>> To: ui@...
>> Subject: [UI] [Slightly OT] Stability of Squeak
>>
>>
>> Gang,
>>
>> Has there been a resolution of the (sorry if I am suffering from  
>> memory
>> corruption here) non-collectable garbage under Gary's enhancements?
>> Another thing that disturbed me was the Croquet group(???)  
>> threatening
>> to drop Squeak servers in favor of Java or similar.  There were some
>> semaphore/delay/shared queue kinds of fixes.  Did they make it into
>> Squeak?
>>
>> Please don't do my homework for me.  I am hoping someone here  
>> happens to
>> remember the details.
>>
>> Bill
>>
>>
>>
>> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
>> University of Florida
>> Department of Anesthesiology
>> PO Box 100254
>> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
>>
>> Email: bschwab@...
>> Tel: (352) 846-1285
>> FAX: (352) 392-7029
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> UI mailing list
>> UI@...
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui
>
> _______________________________________________
> UI mailing list
> UI@...
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui