On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 06:20:47PM -0700, Steven Danneman wrote:
>
> Sorry, my message was a bit confusing.
>
> 0002 is the patch I want you to review/integrate. In applying it from
> my 3.0.24 codebase to 3.0.28a, I found another blocking bug that exists
> in 3.0.28a.
>
> I didn't have time to also thoroughly fix it, so 0001 is a quick hack
> fix for this blocking bug, that should be applied before 0002 so you can
> see that 0002 works. However, the bug fixed by 0001 needs to be
> addressed first.
>
> I can file a more specific bug report on the issue fixed by 0001.
>
> Bah, this is confusing. I'm on IRC for the next 40 minutes if you want
> to hash it out.
Sorry, I'm at home and won't be back on IRC until tomorrow morning.
I'll review/add 0002, and discuss 0001 with Jerry tomorrow. Do
both these issues appear in 3.2 ? (I imagine so). Logging bugs
for both of them (as they appear to be 3.2 showstoppers) would
also help, as we'll need that to get them into 3.2-stable for
release.
Thanks,
Jeremy.
