I can see this scenario but I think we are dealing with something else
here. I think there is a better way to approach it. Regardless, I think
it is unreasonable to expect DWR to know what to send the server. I think
the developer has to be responsible for what he sends to the server. If
you want a skimmed down version of something create the skimmed down
version and pass that to the server.
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Randy Jones
randy_jones@...
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:19:05 -0700
To:
users@...
Subject: RE: [dwr-user] Excluding properties when converting from
JavaScript to Java objects
I've had the same problem with a JS Lib I'm using where I want to send some
of its objects to DWR, but it has alot of client side attributes for
graphics/handlers. I haven't found a way around it. DWR has nothing on the
client side to tell it to only send certain attributes of an object.
Randy
________________________________
From: Bruno Klava [mailto:
bklava@...]
Sent: Thu 4/17/2008 4:13 PM
To:
users@...
Subject: Re: [dwr-user] Excluding properties when converting from
JavaScript to Java objects
> I am a bit confused. If b is not a part of Foo why are you setting it in
> your JavaScript object?
It's a gui element representing this object (the user can manipulate
the data using the gui elements, and the structure is quite complex,
so i need a reference from each element to its gui element).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
users-help@...
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
users-help@...
