« Return to Thread: Compiler messages
RE: Compiler messages
by Bill Schwab
::
Rate this Message:
Gary,
I will gladly give it a shot. What is the best way to distribute it?
Ideally, it should be part of the mainstream release so that the changes
will be maintained, but it might be easier to make it part of our
group's output. What do you think?
Which version of Squeak would you recommend as a starting point?
Bill
Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of Anesthesiology
PO Box 100254
Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
Email: bschwab@...
Tel: (352) 846-1285
FAX: (352) 392-7029
>>> gazzaguru2@... 11/11/07 9:20 AM >>>
You'll probably need to modify the "error correction" methods in the
Parser
class... perhaps some preferences would be in order (like "don't ask,
show
in Transcript instead" etc.).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ui-bounces@...
> [mailto:ui-bounces@...]On Behalf Of Bill Schwab
> Sent: 11 November 2007 12:25 AM
> To: ui@...
> Subject: [UI] Compiler messages
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to get something done, so I thought it might be a goodtime
> to insist on Squeak on Linux. Is there any way to gag the compiler
> messages that mess with me (in SERIES!!!!) about the unused variable
> names (I will need them as soon as I enter the debugger to start the
> real work) and confirming the method name that is not (YET) defined?
>
> The checks would be great, if not modal.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
> University of Florida
> Department of Anesthesiology
> PO Box 100254
> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
>
> Email: bschwab@...
> Tel: (352) 846-1285
> FAX: (352) 392-7029
>
> _______________________________________________
> UI mailing list
> UI@...
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui
_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
UI@...
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui
_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
UI@...
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui
I will gladly give it a shot. What is the best way to distribute it?
Ideally, it should be part of the mainstream release so that the changes
will be maintained, but it might be easier to make it part of our
group's output. What do you think?
Which version of Squeak would you recommend as a starting point?
Bill
Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of Anesthesiology
PO Box 100254
Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
Email: bschwab@...
Tel: (352) 846-1285
FAX: (352) 392-7029
>>> gazzaguru2@... 11/11/07 9:20 AM >>>
You'll probably need to modify the "error correction" methods in the
Parser
class... perhaps some preferences would be in order (like "don't ask,
show
in Transcript instead" etc.).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ui-bounces@...
> [mailto:ui-bounces@...]On Behalf Of Bill Schwab
> Sent: 11 November 2007 12:25 AM
> To: ui@...
> Subject: [UI] Compiler messages
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to get something done, so I thought it might be a good
> to insist on Squeak on Linux. Is there any way to gag the compiler
> messages that mess with me (in SERIES!!!!) about the unused variable
> names (I will need them as soon as I enter the debugger to start the
> real work) and confirming the method name that is not (YET) defined?
>
> The checks would be great, if not modal.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
> University of Florida
> Department of Anesthesiology
> PO Box 100254
> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
>
> Email: bschwab@...
> Tel: (352) 846-1285
> FAX: (352) 392-7029
>
> _______________________________________________
> UI mailing list
> UI@...
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui
_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
UI@...
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui
_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
UI@...
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui
« Return to Thread: Compiler messages
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |