« Return to Thread: Compiler messages

RE: Compiler messages

by Gary Chambers-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

You'll probably need to modify the "error correction" methods in the Parser
class... perhaps some preferences would be in order (like "don't ask, show
in Transcript instead" etc.).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ui-bounces@...
> [mailto:ui-bounces@...]On Behalf Of Bill Schwab
> Sent: 11 November 2007 12:25 AM
> To: ui@...
> Subject: [UI] Compiler messages
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am trying to get something done, so I thought it might be a good time
> to insist on Squeak on Linux.  Is there any way to gag the compiler
> messages that mess with me (in SERIES!!!!) about the unused variable
> names (I will need them as soon as I enter the debugger to start the
> real work) and confirming the method name that is not (YET) defined?
>
> The checks would be great, if not modal.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
> University of Florida
> Department of Anesthesiology
> PO Box 100254
> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
>
> Email: bschwab@...
> Tel: (352) 846-1285
> FAX: (352) 392-7029
>
> _______________________________________________
> UI mailing list
> UI@...
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui

_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
UI@...
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui

 « Return to Thread: Compiler messages

LightInTheBox - Buy quality products at wholesale price