Possible Showstopper in handling of user profiles

View: New views
8 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Possible Showstopper in handling of user profiles

by Mathias Bauer :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Moin,

I didn't create an issue until now because I'm unsure whether this is a
showstopper or not because it "only" affects users that have installed a
3.0 beta.

When 3.0 Beta is installed, it creates an "OpenOffice.org3" user profile
(or .openoffice.org3 on Linux and Solaris).  When now the final version
is installed, it will use this profile.

In this case we don't offer the user a user data migration as we would
do if no OOo3 but an OOo2 profile is found. This might be unwanted.

Moreover, we have removed a basic library between OOo3 Beta and OOo3
Final. If now OOo3 Final is working on the OOo Beta profile, the user
will get two error messages each time Basic is accessed the first time
(what usually happens when a document is saved). The error message can
be removed only by manual editing a configuration file in the profile.

If all users would be affected by this bug, I think it's clear that this
would be a showstopper. As it "only" affects beta users: do we still
consider this to be a showstopper?

Ciao,
Mathias

--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to "nospamformba@...".
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: releases-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: releases-help@...


Re: Possible Showstopper in handling of user profiles

by Eike Rathke :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi Mathias,

On Thursday, 2008-07-24 13:01:27 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:

> If all users would be affected by this bug, I think it's clear that this
> would be a showstopper. As it "only" affects beta users: do we still
> consider this to be a showstopper?

IMHO yes. IIRC it was explicitly stated that Betas will not have
a migration path but Final will, to not end up with an unmaintainable
matrix of profile conversions. Given the wide spread Beta (we _intended_
that to be heavily used), this and

> the user
> will get two error messages each time Basic is accessed the first time
> (what usually happens when a document is saved). The error message can
> be removed only by manual editing a configuration file in the profile.

to me qualify as clear show stoppers.

  Eike

--
 OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
 SunSign   0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304  7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412
 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
 Please don't send personal mail to the erl@... account, which I use for
 mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use erack@... Thanks.


attachment0 (196 bytes) Download Attachment

Re: Possible Showstopper in handling of user profiles

by Mathias Bauer :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi Eike,

Eike Rathke wrote:

> Hi Mathias,
>
> On Thursday, 2008-07-24 13:01:27 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>
>> If all users would be affected by this bug, I think it's clear that this
>> would be a showstopper. As it "only" affects beta users: do we still
>> consider this to be a showstopper?
>
> IMHO yes. IIRC it was explicitly stated that Betas will not have
> a migration path but Final will, to not end up with an unmaintainable
> matrix of profile conversions. Given the wide spread Beta (we _intended_
> that to be heavily used), this and
>
>> the user
>> will get two error messages each time Basic is accessed the first time
>> (what usually happens when a document is saved). The error message can
>> be removed only by manual editing a configuration file in the profile.
>
> to me qualify as clear show stoppers.

So far we are two of us. :-)
Would like to get some more answers.

Fixing the bug would require to use new names for the user profile. I
already tested if there is a way to wipe out the beta profile, but due
to the bootstrap mess I don't see a safe way to do that.

So what about using "openoffice.org_3" instead of "openoffice.org3" as
in the beta? That would be a safe way to make sure that profiles created
by the beta will be ignored. I don't expect that anybody should have a
problem with the exact name of the profile.

Ciao,
Mathias

--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to "nospamformba@...".
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: releases-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: releases-help@...


Re: Possible Showstopper in handling of user profiles

by Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi Mathias,

> So far we are two of us. :-)
> Would like to get some more answers.

Count me in (whatever that's worth). A final release which is that
heavily confused by the previously installed Beta is No Good (TM).

> So what about using "openoffice.org_3" instead of "openoffice.org3" as
> in the beta?

Assuming that a 3.1 will use openoffice.org31 or openoffice.org3.1, what
about "openoffice3[.]0"?

Ciao
Frank

--
- Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer         frank.schoenheit@... -
- Sun Microsystems                      http://www.sun.com/staroffice -
- OpenOffice.org Base                       http://dba.openoffice.org -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: releases-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: releases-help@...


Parent Message unknown Re: Possible Showstopper in handling of user profiles

by Olaf Felka :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,


> Hi Mathias,
>
>> So far we are two of us. :-)
>> Would like to get some more answers.
>
> Count me in (whatever that's worth). A final release which is that
> heavily confused by the previously installed Beta is No Good (TM).
>
>> So what about using "openoffice.org_3" instead of "openoffice.org3" as
>> in the beta?
>
> Assuming that a 3.1 will use openoffice.org31 or openoffice.org3.1, what
> about "openoffice3[.]0"?

I hope that the user layer won't change it's name with every release. We
haven't done this in OOo 2.x and shouldn't do this for OOo3.x

Groetjes,
Olaf

http://www.openoffice.org/
http://qa.openoffice.org/ooQAReloaded/FrameworkTeamsite/ooQA-TeamFramework.html

--

Sun Microsystems GmbH           Olaf Felka
Nagelsweg 55                    Quality Assurance Engineer
20097 Hamburg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: releases-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: releases-help@...


Re: Possible Showstopper in handling of user profiles

by Mathias Bauer :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:

> Hi Mathias,
>
>> So far we are two of us. :-)
>> Would like to get some more answers.
>
> Count me in (whatever that's worth). A final release which is that
> heavily confused by the previously installed Beta is No Good (TM).
>
>> So what about using "openoffice.org_3" instead of "openoffice.org3" as
>> in the beta?
>
> Assuming that a 3.1 will use openoffice.org31 or openoffice.org3.1, what
> about "openoffice3[.]0"?

We shouldn't change the profile name in minor versions, the profile
should stay the same through the release. I don't see any reason for
that but a lot of drawbacks.

Ciao,
Mathias

--
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to "nospamformba@...".
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: releases-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: releases-help@...


Re: Possible Showstopper in handling of user profiles

by Florian Effenberger-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

> We shouldn't change the profile name in minor versions, the profile
> should stay the same through the release. I don't see any reason for
> that but a lot of drawbacks.

I absolutely agree. Don't modify the profile path between minor and
micro versions, this just causes lots of pain.

Florian

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: releases-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: releases-help@...


Re: Possible Showstopper in handling of user profiles

by Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi Mathias,

>> Assuming that a 3.1 will use openoffice.org31 or openoffice.org3.1, what
>> about "openoffice3[.]0"?
>
> We shouldn't change the profile name in minor versions, the profile
> should stay the same through the release.

Ah, didn't know that (could have, though)

Ciao
Frank

--
- Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer         frank.schoenheit@... -
- Sun Microsystems                      http://www.sun.com/staroffice -
- OpenOffice.org Base                       http://dba.openoffice.org -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: releases-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: releases-help@...

LightInTheBox - Buy quality products at wholesale price