> Hello,
>
> For a new project of ours, we looked at several different logging
> frameworks and decided on using NLog. Thanks for making NLog great!
>
> We made a couple of minor performance enhancements to speed up our
> particular usage of NLog. I would like to find out if others are
> interested in these performance enhancements or if anyone sees any
> problems with these:
>
> 1. Added Write(LogEvent[]) override to the MSMQ class. This removes the
> overhead of checking for the queue's existence, connecting and
> disconnecting for every insert if you are batching the inserts (e.g.
> through a buffered wrapper or async wrapper).
> 2. Updated the Async wrapper class so that it doesn't go back to sleep
> after processing a callback if there are still enough items on the queue
> for a full batch.
>
> We did some decent performance testing benchmarks before and after, and
> saw significant gains in the applicable test cases (by roughly a factor of
> 5). I can provide more detail on the performance test if someone is truly
> interested (the test results currently are not written up for release).
That sounds like a nice addition to NLog. Can you send a patch so that
people on the list can review it? I'll be happy to include it in the
source.
Jarek
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php_______________________________________________
Nlog-list mailing list
Nlog-list@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nlog-list
Some parts of this message have been removed.
Learn more about Nabble's