|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Nautilus+GIO vs GnomeApps+GNOMEVFS (aka: the clash on trash)I'm playing with my jhbuild development install.
We have a serious issue about trash: gio+gvfs implements the fd.o trash spec, gnome-vfs uses the old, custom ~/.Trash directory. ################ Example 1: I'm using EoG to browse some photos to store. I want to remove some, then I use the "Move to Trash" feature inside EoG. Result 1: trashed photos will never appear in trash:// 'cause was moved to ~/.Trash, not .local/share/Trash. Those photos will survive as zombies in my file system... Example 2: my distro removed desktop icons an provided the trash applet. Result 2: a big mess: the applet will open trash:// but will move files to and will monitor ~/.Trash :-( ################ Some applications are moving to gio/gvfs, meanwhile, could we: * implement fd.o trash in gnome-vfs * run a (hidden) migrate trash (at Nautilus startup?) is .Trash exists and there are files? PS there is a yet open bug against EoG. Alex, could you port the trash applet to GIO? _______________________________________________ gnome-vfs-list mailing list gnome-vfs-list@... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list |
|
|
Re: Nautilus+GIO vs GnomeApps+GNOMEVFS (aka: the clash on trash)Il giorno mar, 15/01/2008 alle 17.14 +0100, Luca Ferretti ha scritto: > I'm playing with my jhbuild development install. > > We have a serious issue about trash: gio+gvfs implements the fd.o trash > spec, gnome-vfs uses the old, custom ~/.Trash directory. Filed Trash applet bug on bugzilla http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509759 _______________________________________________ gnome-vfs-list mailing list gnome-vfs-list@... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list |
|
|
Re: Nautilus+GIO vs GnomeApps+GNOMEVFS (aka: the clash on trash)On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 17:14 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote: > I'm playing with my jhbuild development install. > > We have a serious issue about trash: gio+gvfs implements the fd.o trash > spec, gnome-vfs uses the old, custom ~/.Trash directory. > > ################ > > Example 1: I'm using EoG to browse some photos to store. I want to > remove some, then I use the "Move to Trash" feature inside EoG. > > Result 1: trashed photos will never appear in trash:// 'cause was moved > to ~/.Trash, not .local/share/Trash. Those photos will survive as > zombies in my file system... > > Example 2: my distro removed desktop icons an provided the trash applet. > > Result 2: a big mess: the applet will open trash:// but will move files > to and will monitor ~/.Trash :-( > > ################ > > Some applications are moving to gio/gvfs, meanwhile, could we: > * implement fd.o trash in gnome-vfs Trash is pretty complex in gnome-vfs, so I doubt this is a good thing to spend our time on. Converting apps to use the trash via gio seems better. Trashing a file is far easier in gio anyway, just call the g_file_trash() operation. > * run a (hidden) migrate trash (at Nautilus startup?) is .Trash > exists and there are files? Yeah, we should probably do that somewhere. I was thinking gnome-session could do it. > PS there is a yet open bug against EoG. Alex, could you port the trash > applet to GIO? I've never worked on the trash applet really, and I'm busy fixing other regressions. Ideally the maintainers of it would do the port (which should be pretty simple). _______________________________________________ gnome-vfs-list mailing list gnome-vfs-list@... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list |
|
|
Re: Nautilus+GIO vs GnomeApps+GNOMEVFS (aka: the clash on trash)Il giorno mer, 16/01/2008 alle 12.42 +0100, Alexander Larsson ha scritto: > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 17:14 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > > > Some applications are moving to gio/gvfs, meanwhile, could we: > > * implement fd.o trash in gnome-vfs > > Trash is pretty complex in gnome-vfs, so I doubt this is a good thing to > spend our time on. Converting apps to use the trash via gio seems > better. Trashing a file is far easier in gio anyway, just call the > g_file_trash() operation. That's true! However, could you please check the patch I produced for cheese? What should we do when error is != NULL after a g_file_trash ? http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509327 _______________________________________________ gnome-vfs-list mailing list gnome-vfs-list@... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list |
|
|
Re: Nautilus+GIO vs GnomeApps+GNOMEVFS (aka: the clash on trash)On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 15:43 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote: > Il giorno mer, 16/01/2008 alle 12.42 +0100, Alexander Larsson ha > scritto: > > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 17:14 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > > > > > Some applications are moving to gio/gvfs, meanwhile, could we: > > > * implement fd.o trash in gnome-vfs > > > > Trash is pretty complex in gnome-vfs, so I doubt this is a good thing to > > spend our time on. Converting apps to use the trash via gio seems > > better. Trashing a file is far easier in gio anyway, just call the > > g_file_trash() operation. > > That's true! > > However, could you please check the patch I produced for cheese? What > should we do when error is != NULL after a g_file_trash ? What nautilus does is open a dialog saying there was an error, blah, blah, then asking if you want to delete the file instead. _______________________________________________ gnome-vfs-list mailing list gnome-vfs-list@... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-vfs-list |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |