The table 'EC Extension table' [1] is missing a row defining the
semantics of
annotation(p v) for v a literal
I suspect the desired interpretation is
{x \in R | <x, S(v)> \in ER(p)}
[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/direct.html#3.2--
Dave Turner Cube T400, HP Labs Bristol, Filton Road, Bristol BS34 8QZ
davidt@... +44 117 3129104 (Work) +44 7962 811627 (Mobile)
Hewlett-Packard Limited. Registered No: 690597 England
Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN