Method Usages -- clunky, especially compared to other IDEs?

View: New views
2 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Method Usages -- clunky, especially compared to other IDEs?

by RandallBSmith :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I failed to find this discussed in the forums, forgive me if I am missing an accelerated feature.

As an avid user of inheritance in Java, I am constantly needing to navigate up and down the hierarchy to visit  all the various overriding implementations of a method. In other IDEs I have used or seen used, this can be done quite directly (e.g.:  with a pop-up menu listing the classes that implement the selected method), but in NB it requires popping up a dialogue, possibly making a dialog mode adjustment, waiting, visiting the output window, and possibly scrolling within that to find the desired usage to click on.

Does NB have a better way I am missing? If not, have others found this unnecessarily time consuming, and if so, how should I constructively place a feature request?

Thanks,
       --Randy

Re: Method Usages -- clunky, especially compared to other IDEs?

by jiri prox :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

the request is already reported, see
http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=130161 and feel free to
vote for it or add comment.

Thanks
Jirka


RandallBSmith wrote:

> I failed to find this discussed in the forums, forgive me if I am missing an
> accelerated feature.
>
> As an avid user of inheritance in Java, I am constantly needing to navigate
> up and down the hierarchy to visit  all the various overriding
> implementations of a method. In other IDEs I have used or seen used, this
> can be done quite directly (e.g.:  with a pop-up menu listing the classes
> that implement the selected method), but in NB it requires popping up a
> dialogue, possibly making a dialog mode adjustment, waiting, visiting the
> output window, and possibly scrolling within that to find the desired usage
> to click on.
>
> Does NB have a better way I am missing? If not, have others found this
> unnecessarily time consuming, and if so, how should I constructively place a
> feature request?
>
> Thanks,
>        --Randy
>