|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Matthew on ephemeraGreetings to all from Tucson, Arizona. A bit of holiday R&R and so not on my
home machine. Matthew asked me to upload this image . . . a bit trickier to do when I not an official user on mom's laptop. But my FTP program is on my flashdrive and we eventually got lucky. As sent by Matthew follows: Milan, Please make this available on line. I am sending you the email that concerns the jpg. ************************************ With the internet and new public access to this ephemera, I would say the value of any of this ephemera will slowly become worthless, so why not share ? Google is destroying the ephemera market ! ************************************ The above statement confuses me. I am writing this because I hold so many of you members in respect that I feel I can share some of my opinions with you even if they differ from yours. To those who feel the ephemera market is crashing: I find the high end ephemera market is stronger than ever. On November 7, 2007, I paid on eBay $919.00 plus shipping for a 2 ft. wide broadside from a tintype gallery printed in the 1860s or 1870s. There were 20 bids from 8 different collectors. I do not believe public access depreciates an item. I just believe it makes the focused collector more aware of what is out there and he or she would still want the original as opposed to a copy. Now, if you mean common garden variety ephemera, I believe eBay has brought prices into line for plain merchandise, but my personal experience is the thrilling pieces of ephemera keep going up in value. I was outbid at the Naylor auction on two small pieces of paper, one a rare invoice and the other an even rarer ad. The first brought over $5000, and the second brought over $7000 and the high bidder in both cases was a dealer. For those of you who feel differently, I would like some concrete examples of your experience. I also consider early labeled bottles ephemera and they are still going up in value. I do admit, the garden variety Anthony bottles have leveled off, but that is because so many of them have surfaced through eBay. It seems to be a perfect case for supply and demand determining the price. I have a wonderful 1947 copy of a Beard polychrome advertisement that was originally printed a century earlier. I would still love to get the original. The copy usually can be bought for about 30 to 70 dollars depending on who is buying and who is selling, but I and at least a half dozen others would pay a healthy four figure price for the original. There are copies of the 1839 Daguerre manual available, but they have not affected the price of an original. I do not believe the sky is falling, and I still have faith that really great antiques of any variety, and that includes ephemera are still a wonderful investment. It is not exposure to the items that makes the price drop, it is either a change in contemporary taste or a case of supply and demand, and of course, demand is determined by contemporary taste. I hope the previous paragraph is meant to start a dialogue, not an argument. MRI PS: Come on, MZ, let me hear from you also. Oh yes, I will send a high quality scan to Milan so you can also appreciate this 24" wide piece of paper, and yes, size does count. Look at the lens! MZ replies: My, that's a big one, but I suspect an artists rendering with a bit of license. |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Matthew on ephemeraMilan,
I do not see an image or a pointer to one. Ralph |
|
|
RE: Matthew on ephemeraFirst off, my statements were exaggerated for effect - but I do believe that the worldwide scanning of books and posting them on line for free access will ( and already has ) impact the PAPER ephemera market.
Secondly, it was also a little joust to see if we as a group were willing to share more - Matthew included ! Dan ________________________________ From: woodandbrass-bounces@... on behalf of Milan Zahorcak* Sent: Sun 12/16/2007 10:41 AM To: Unknown Wood & Brass Subject: [W&B] Matthew on ephemera Greetings to all from Tucson, Arizona. A bit of holiday R&R and so not on my home machine. Matthew asked me to upload this image . . . a bit trickier to do when I not an official user on mom's laptop. But my FTP program is on my flashdrive and we eventually got lucky. As sent by Matthew follows: Milan, Please make this available on line. I am sending you the email that concerns the jpg. ************************************ With the internet and new public access to this ephemera, I would say the value of any of this ephemera will slowly become worthless, so why not share ? Google is destroying the ephemera market ! ************************************ The above statement confuses me. I am writing this because I hold so many of you members in respect that I feel I can share some of my opinions with you even if they differ from yours. To those who feel the ephemera market is crashing: I find the high end ephemera market is stronger than ever. On November 7, 2007, I paid on eBay $919.00 plus shipping for a 2 ft. wide broadside from a tintype gallery printed in the 1860s or 1870s. There were 20 bids from 8 different collectors. I do not believe public access depreciates an item. I just believe it makes the focused collector more aware of what is out there and he or she would still want the original as opposed to a copy. Now, if you mean common garden variety ephemera, I believe eBay has brought prices into line for plain merchandise, but my personal experience is the thrilling pieces of ephemera keep going up in value. I was outbid at the Naylor auction on two small pieces of paper, one a rare invoice and the other an even rarer ad. The first brought over $5000, and the second brought over $7000 and the high bidder in both cases was a dealer. For those of you who feel differently, I would like some concrete examples of your experience. I also consider early labeled bottles ephemera and they are still going up in value. I do admit, the garden variety Anthony bottles have leveled off, but that is because so many of them have surfaced through eBay. It seems to be a perfect case for supply and demand determining the price. I have a wonderful 1947 copy of a Beard polychrome advertisement that was originally printed a century earlier. I would still love to get the original. The copy usually can be bought for about 30 to 70 dollars depending on who is buying and who is selling, but I and at least a half dozen others would pay a healthy four figure price for the original. There are copies of the 1839 Daguerre manual available, but they have not affected the price of an original. I do not believe the sky is falling, and I still have faith that really great antiques of any variety, and that includes ephemera are still a wonderful investment. It is not exposure to the items that makes the price drop, it is either a change in contemporary taste or a case of supply and demand, and of course, demand is determined by contemporary taste. I hope the previous paragraph is meant to start a dialogue, not an argument. MRI PS: Come on, MZ, let me hear from you also. Oh yes, I will send a high quality scan to Milan so you can also appreciate this 24" wide piece of paper, and yes, size does count. Look at the lens! MZ replies: My, that's a big one, but I suspect an artists rendering with a bit of license. |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |