Hello there,
Has anyone used the "record_" functions that are used to inform an
SsaCfg object about changes made to the SSA code? If a new definition
is added to the SSA code, record_def() is supposed to be used to take
note of it. However, it asks for an "old_name" which is required for
CFG restoration.
void record_def(SsaCfg*, Opnd old_name, Operation, int dst_pos = 0);
How should the old names be selected when new definitions are being
added to the SSA code based on new SSA names?
regards,
Soumyaroop.
--
Soumyaroop Roy
Ph.D. Student
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
University of South Florida, Tampa
http://www.csee.usf.edu/~sroy"If you haven't pissed off anybody, you haven't taken a decision" -
Lavi Lev, Former Exec. VP of Cadence Design Systems
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, send mail to
suif-talk-unsubscribe@...
or visit
http://suif.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/suif-talk
