MPM question...

[Frank Wiles]

  Hi Everyone,

  I was reading over /docs/2.0/user/intro/overview.html and there is
  a note about the perchild MPM saying that "as of this writing this
  MPM isn't working".  Is that still the case?  

 ---------------------------------
   Frank Wiles <frank@...>
   http://www.wiles.org
 ---------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@...

[Geoffrey Young]

Frank Wiles wrote:
>   Hi Everyone,
>
>   I was reading over /docs/2.0/user/intro/overview.html and there is
>   a note about the perchild MPM saying that "as of this writing this
>   MPM isn't working".  Is that still the case?  

as far as I know that's correct, but I'm not 100% sure.

--Geoff

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@...

[Stas Bekman]

Geoffrey Young wrote:
>
> Frank Wiles wrote:
>
>>  Hi Everyone,
>>
>>  I was reading over /docs/2.0/user/intro/overview.html and there is

That doc is very old and very outdated. Doug wrote it about 5-6 years ago
and then we adjusted it a bit, but it's still not quite good. May be the
best approach is to kill it completely and then re-add only parts that you
know are good.

--
_____________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman mailto:stas@...  http://stason.org/
MailChannels: Assured Messaging(TM) http://mailchannels.com/
The "Practical mod_perl" book       http://modperlbook.org/
http://perl.apache.org/ http://perl.org/ http://logilune.com/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@...

[Frank Wiles]

On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:39:52 -0800
Stas Bekman <stas@...> wrote:

> Geoffrey Young wrote:
> >
> > Frank Wiles wrote:
> >
> >>  Hi Everyone,
> >>
> >>  I was reading over /docs/2.0/user/intro/overview.html and there is
>
> That doc is very old and very outdated. Doug wrote it about 5-6 years
> ago and then we adjusted it a bit, but it's still not quite good. May
> be the best approach is to kill it completely and then re-add only
> parts that you know are good.

  Yeah actually I've been re-reading most of the site lately getting
  ready to suggest some big changes to a few pages to help out the
  newer ( and sometimes less techie ) users.  

  I'll add the overview page to the list I want to redo.

 ---------------------------------
   Frank Wiles <frank@...>
   http://www.wiles.org
 ---------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-dev-help@...