|
View:
New views
8 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
MLE for noncentral t distributionI have a data with 236 observations. After plotting the histogram, I found that it looks like non-central t distribution. I would like to get MLE for mu and df.
I found an example to find MLE for gamma distribution from "fitting distributions with R": library(stats4) ## loading package stats4 ll<-function(lambda,alfa) {n<-200 x<-x.gam -n*alfa*log(lambda)+n*log(gamma(alfa))-(alfa- 1)*sum(log(x))+lambda*sum(x)} ## -log-likelihood function est<-mle(minuslog=ll, start=list(lambda=2,alfa=1)) Is anyone how how to write down -log-likelihood function for noncentral t distribution? Thanks a lot!! Kate [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ R-help@... mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. |
|
|
Re: MLE for noncentral t distributionOn 5/8/2008 10:34 AM, kate wrote:
> I have a data with 236 observations. After plotting the histogram, I found that it looks like non-central t distribution. I would like to get MLE for mu and df. > > I found an example to find MLE for gamma distribution from "fitting distributions with R": > > library(stats4) ## loading package stats4 > ll<-function(lambda,alfa) {n<-200 > x<-x.gam > -n*alfa*log(lambda)+n*log(gamma(alfa))-(alfa- > 1)*sum(log(x))+lambda*sum(x)} ## -log-likelihood function > est<-mle(minuslog=ll, start=list(lambda=2,alfa=1)) > > Is anyone how how to write down -log-likelihood function for noncentral t distribution? dt() has a non-centrality parameter and a log parameter, so it would simply be ll <- function(x, ncp, df) sum(dt(x, ncp=ncp, df=df, log=TRUE)) Make sure you convert mu into the ncp properly; the man page says how ncp is interpreted. Duncan Murdoch ______________________________________________ R-help@... mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. |
|
|
Re: MLE for noncentral t distributionOn Thu, 8 May 2008, kate wrote:
> I have a data with 236 observations. After plotting the histogram, I > found that it looks like non-central t distribution. I would like to get > MLE for mu and df. So you mean 'non-central'? See ?dt. > I found an example to find MLE for gamma distribution from "fitting distributions with R": > > library(stats4) ## loading package stats4 > ll<-function(lambda,alfa) {n<-200 > x<-x.gam > -n*alfa*log(lambda)+n*log(gamma(alfa))-(alfa- > 1)*sum(log(x))+lambda*sum(x)} ## -log-likelihood function > est<-mle(minuslog=ll, start=list(lambda=2,alfa=1)) > > Is anyone how how to write down -log-likelihood function for noncentral t distribution? Just use dt. E.g. > library(MASS) > ?fitdistr shows you a worked example for location, scale and df, but note the comments. You could fit a non-central t, but it would be unusual to do so. > > Thanks a lot!! > > Kate > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@... mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > -- Brian D. Ripley, ripley@... Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 ______________________________________________ R-help@... mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. |
|
|
Re: MLE for noncentral t distributionThanks for your quick reply.
I try the command as follows, library(stats4) ## loading package stats4 ll <- function(change, ncp, df) {-sum(dt(x, ncp=ncp, df=df, log=TRUE))}#-log-likelihood function est<-mle(minuslog=ll, start=list(ncp=-0.3,df=2)) But the warnings appears as follows, invalid class "mle" object: invalid object for slot "fullcoef" in class "mle": got class "list", should be or extend class "numeric" When I typed warnings(), I get In dt(x, ncp = ncp, df = df, log = TRUE) : full precision was not achieved in 'pnt' Does anyone know how to solve it? Thanks, Kate ----- Original Message ----- From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch@...> To: "kate" <yhsu6@...> Cc: <r-help@...> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 9:46 AM Subject: Re: [R] MLE for noncentral t distribution > On 5/8/2008 10:34 AM, kate wrote: >> I have a data with 236 observations. After plotting the histogram, I >> found that it looks like non-central t distribution. I would like to get >> MLE for mu and df. I found an example to find MLE for gamma distribution >> from "fitting distributions with R": >> >> library(stats4) ## loading package stats4 >> ll<-function(lambda,alfa) {n<-200 >> x<-x.gam >> -n*alfa*log(lambda)+n*log(gamma(alfa))-(alfa- >> 1)*sum(log(x))+lambda*sum(x)} ## -log-likelihood function >> est<-mle(minuslog=ll, start=list(lambda=2,alfa=1)) >> >> Is anyone how how to write down -log-likelihood function for noncentral t >> distribution? > > > dt() has a non-centrality parameter and a log parameter, so it would > simply be > > ll <- function(x, ncp, df) sum(dt(x, ncp=ncp, df=df, log=TRUE)) > > Make sure you convert mu into the ncp properly; the man page says how ncp > is interpreted. > > Duncan Murdoch ______________________________________________ R-help@... mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. |
|
|
Re: MLE for noncentral t distributionIn my data, sample mean =-0.3 and the histogram looks like t distribution;
therefore, I thought non-central t distribution may be a good fit. Anyway, I try t distribution to get MLE. I found some warnings as follows; besides, I got three parameter estimators: m=0.23, s=4.04, df=1.66. I want to simulate the data with sample size 236 and this parameter estimates. Is the command rt(236, df=1.66)? Where should I put m and s when I do simulation? m s df 0.2340746 4.0447124 1.6614823 (0.3430796) (0.4158891) (0.2638703) Warning messages: 1: In dt(x, df, log) : generates NaNs 2: In dt(x, df, log) : generates NaNs 3: In dt(x, df, log) :generates NaNs 4: In log(s) : generates NaNs 5: In dt(x, df, log) : generates NaNs 6: In dt(x, df, log) : generates NaNs Thanks a lot, Kate ----- Original Message ----- From: "Prof Brian Ripley" <ripley@...> To: "kate" <yhsu6@...> Cc: <r-help@...> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:02 AM Subject: Re: [R] MLE for noncentral t distribution > On Thu, 8 May 2008, kate wrote: > >> I have a data with 236 observations. After plotting the histogram, I >> found that it looks like non-central t distribution. I would like to get >> MLE for mu and df. > > So you mean 'non-central'? See ?dt. > >> I found an example to find MLE for gamma distribution from "fitting >> distributions with R": >> >> library(stats4) ## loading package stats4 >> ll<-function(lambda,alfa) {n<-200 >> x<-x.gam >> -n*alfa*log(lambda)+n*log(gamma(alfa))-(alfa- >> 1)*sum(log(x))+lambda*sum(x)} ## -log-likelihood function >> est<-mle(minuslog=ll, start=list(lambda=2,alfa=1)) >> >> Is anyone how how to write down -log-likelihood function for noncentral t >> distribution? > > Just use dt. E.g. > >> library(MASS) >> ?fitdistr > > shows you a worked example for location, scale and df, but note the > comments. You could fit a non-central t, but it would be unusual to do > so. > >> >> Thanks a lot!! >> >> Kate >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-help@... mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help >> PLEASE do read the posting guide >> http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html >> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. >> > > -- > Brian D. Ripley, ripley@... > Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ > University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) > 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) > Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595 ______________________________________________ R-help@... mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. |
|
|
Re: MLE for noncentral t distributionQRMlib has routines for fitting t distributions. Have a look at that package. Also sn has routines for skew-t distributions David Scott On Thu, 8 May 2008, kate wrote: > I have a data with 236 observations. After plotting the histogram, I found that it looks like non-central t distribution. I would like to get MLE for mu and df. > > I found an example to find MLE for gamma distribution from "fitting distributions with R": > > library(stats4) ## loading package stats4 > ll<-function(lambda,alfa) {n<-200 > x<-x.gam > -n*alfa*log(lambda)+n*log(gamma(alfa))-(alfa- > 1)*sum(log(x))+lambda*sum(x)} ## -log-likelihood function > est<-mle(minuslog=ll, start=list(lambda=2,alfa=1)) > > Is anyone how how to write down -log-likelihood function for noncentral t distribution? > > Thanks a lot!! > > Kate > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@... mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > _________________________________________________________________ David Scott Department of Statistics, Tamaki Campus The University of Auckland, PB 92019 Auckland 1142, NEW ZEALAND Phone: +64 9 373 7599 ext 86830 Fax: +64 9 373 7000 Email: d.scott@... Graduate Officer, Department of Statistics Director of Consulting, Department of Statistics ______________________________________________ R-help@... mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. |
|
|
Re: MLE for noncentral t distribution>>>>> "k" == kate <yhsu6@...>
>>>>> on Thu, 8 May 2008 10:45:04 -0500 writes: k> In my data, sample mean =-0.3 and the histogram looks like t distribution; k> therefore, I thought non-central t distribution may be a good fit. Anyway, I k> try t distribution to get MLE. I found some warnings as follows; besides, I k> got three parameter estimators: m=0.23, s=4.04, df=1.66. I want to simulate k> the data with sample size 236 and this parameter estimates. Is the command k> rt(236, df=1.66)? Where should I put m and s when I do simulation? m + s * rt(n, df= df) [I still hope this isn't a student homework problem...] Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich k> m s df k> 0.2340746 4.0447124 1.6614823 k> (0.3430796) (0.4158891) (0.2638703) k> Warning messages: k> 1: In dt(x, df, log) : generates NaNs k> 2: In dt(x, df, log) : generates NaNs k> 3: In dt(x, df, log) :generates NaNs k> 4: In log(s) : generates NaNs k> 5: In dt(x, df, log) : generates NaNs k> 6: In dt(x, df, log) : generates NaNs k> Thanks a lot, k> Kate k> ----- Original Message ----- k> From: "Prof Brian Ripley" <ripley@...> k> To: "kate" <yhsu6@...> k> Cc: <r-help@...> k> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:02 AM k> Subject: Re: [R] MLE for noncentral t distribution >> On Thu, 8 May 2008, kate wrote: >> >>> I have a data with 236 observations. After plotting the histogram, I >>> found that it looks like non-central t distribution. I would like to get >>> MLE for mu and df. >> >> So you mean 'non-central'? See ?dt. >> >>> I found an example to find MLE for gamma distribution from "fitting >>> distributions with R": >>> >>> library(stats4) ## loading package stats4 >>> ll<-function(lambda,alfa) {n<-200 >>> x<-x.gam >>> -n*alfa*log(lambda)+n*log(gamma(alfa))-(alfa- >>> 1)*sum(log(x))+lambda*sum(x)} ## -log-likelihood function >>> est<-mle(minuslog=ll, start=list(lambda=2,alfa=1)) >>> >>> Is anyone how how to write down -log-likelihood function for noncentral t >>> distribution? >> >> Just use dt. E.g. >> >>> library(MASS) >>> ?fitdistr >> >> shows you a worked example for location, scale and df, but note the >> comments. You could fit a non-central t, but it would be unusual to do >> so. >> >>> >>> Thanks a lot!! >>> >>> Kate ______________________________________________ R-help@... mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. |
|
|
Re: MLE for noncentral t distributionHi, Martin and Kate:
KATE: Do you really want the noncentral t? It has mean zero but strange tails created by a denominator following a noncentral chi-square. The answer Martin gave is for a scaled but otherwise standard t, which sounds like what you want, since you said the "sample mean = 0.23, s = 4.04, etc. A noncentral t has an additional "noncenrality parameter". Hope this helps. Spencer Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> "k" == kate <yhsu6@...> >>>>>> on Thu, 8 May 2008 10:45:04 -0500 writes: >>>>>> > > k> In my data, sample mean =-0.3 and the histogram looks like t distribution; > k> therefore, I thought non-central t distribution may be a good fit. Anyway, I > k> try t distribution to get MLE. I found some warnings as follows; besides, I > k> got three parameter estimators: m=0.23, s=4.04, df=1.66. I want to simulate > k> the data with sample size 236 and this parameter estimates. Is the command > k> rt(236, df=1.66)? Where should I put m and s when I do simulation? > > m + s * rt(n, df= df) > > [I still hope this isn't a student homework problem...] > > Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich > > k> m s df > k> 0.2340746 4.0447124 1.6614823 > k> (0.3430796) (0.4158891) (0.2638703) > k> Warning messages: > k> 1: In dt(x, df, log) : generates NaNs > k> 2: In dt(x, df, log) : generates NaNs > k> 3: In dt(x, df, log) :generates NaNs > k> 4: In log(s) : generates NaNs > k> 5: In dt(x, df, log) : generates NaNs > k> 6: In dt(x, df, log) : generates NaNs > > k> Thanks a lot, > > k> Kate > > k> ----- Original Message ----- > k> From: "Prof Brian Ripley" <ripley@...> > k> To: "kate" <yhsu6@...> > k> Cc: <r-help@...> > k> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 10:02 AM > k> Subject: Re: [R] MLE for noncentral t distribution > > > >> On Thu, 8 May 2008, kate wrote: > >> > >>> I have a data with 236 observations. After plotting the histogram, I > >>> found that it looks like non-central t distribution. I would like to get > >>> MLE for mu and df. > >> > >> So you mean 'non-central'? See ?dt. > >> > >>> I found an example to find MLE for gamma distribution from "fitting > >>> distributions with R": > >>> > >>> library(stats4) ## loading package stats4 > >>> ll<-function(lambda,alfa) {n<-200 > >>> x<-x.gam > >>> -n*alfa*log(lambda)+n*log(gamma(alfa))-(alfa- > >>> 1)*sum(log(x))+lambda*sum(x)} ## -log-likelihood function > >>> est<-mle(minuslog=ll, start=list(lambda=2,alfa=1)) > >>> > >>> Is anyone how how to write down -log-likelihood function for noncentral t > >>> distribution? > >> > >> Just use dt. E.g. > >> > >>> library(MASS) > >>> ?fitdistr > >> > >> shows you a worked example for location, scale and df, but note the > >> comments. You could fit a non-central t, but it would be unusual to do > >> so. > >> > >>> > >>> Thanks a lot!! > >>> > >>> Kate > > ______________________________________________ > R-help@... mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > ______________________________________________ R-help@... mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |