Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
|
View:
New views
14 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by Rafael Laboissiere
::
Rate this Message:
Several octave-forge packages have been updated to Debian unstable and are
waiting in the NEW queue [1] for ftp-master approval. In building the Debian packages, we found some licensing problems. We are maintaining a TODO file with the list of issues, available in our SVN repository [2] (you will find below the current version of this file). Some of these problems have been already reported and discussed in octave-dev. We decided to go ahead and upload the packages despite of the above, essentially because we believe these are not real problems, just cases needing clarifications. We thank the octave-dev developers in advance for fixing the issues listed. [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html [2] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-octave/octave-forge-pkgs/TODO?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 Rafael ====================================================================== copyright stuff (things that still need some review) audio: aurecord.1 (Dirk Edenbuettel) endpoint.doc (?) sample.wav (GPL is not a good idea, unless that file was created with a hex editor) src/Make* communications: doc/comms.pdf (no source shipped (included in SVN)? => mail sent to octave-forge list) inst/doc.info (same) econometrics: kernel_density_cvscore.m (no license statement) kernel_regression_cvscore (ditto) fixed general: inst/fcnchk.m (trivial fucntion, no copyright statement) gsl: src/double_double_to_double.cc.template, src/int_int_double_to_double.cc.template, src/double_mode_to_double.cc.template, src/int_to_double.cc.template src/double_to_double.cc.template, src/int_double_to_double.cc.template (no copyright statement) image: src/__magick_read__.cc (no copyright statement) bwimage.cc (no license conditions) linear-algebra: src/test_gsvd.m (no copyright statement, it is just a test script) miscellaneous: inst/grep.m, inst/inz.m, inst/nze.m, src/octave.dtd, src/listencanfork.c (no copyright statement) src/listen.cc (no copyright statement, contains code taken from the Unix Programming FAQ, Copyright © 2000 Andrew Gierth, but without license conditions) nnet: doc/pdf/neuralNetworkToolboxForOctaveUsersGuide.pdf (no copyright statement, no sources) octcdf: inst/example_netcdf.m, inst/example_opendap.m (no copyright statement) odepkg: inst/doc.info (no copyright owner, no sources) optim: inst/wsolve.m (no copyright owner) doc/mintoolkit.pdf (no copyright statement, no sources) doc/optim-mini-howto-2.pdf (no copyright year, no sources; it's GFDL, is it DFSG-compatible?) optiminterp: inst/example_optiminterp.m (no copyright statement) parallel: src/swab.h (no copyright statement) plot: inst/zoom.m (dummy file; I think it is okay to distribute it without copyright statement) src/grab.cc, src/gpick.cc These files contain the statement * This contains bits of code hacked from the * X Consortium and from Octave. Please see the * appropriate licences. The rest is mine, and * you can do what you want with that part. What should we do? inst/ginput.m (seems to be GPL, but has unclear statement) signal: inst/flattopwin.m (file in public domain but without copyright statement) inst/hann.m (one-line function without copyright statement) sockets: src/sockets.cc (no copyright statement; should we assume the same as in DESCRITPION?) symbolic: doc/symbolic.html (no source and/or no copyright statement) vrml: doc/vrml-mini-howto-1.pdf (no source) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by David Bateman
::
Rate this Message:
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> Several octave-forge packages have been updated to Debian unstable and are > waiting in the NEW queue [1] for ftp-master approval. > > In building the Debian packages, we found some licensing problems. We are > maintaining a TODO file with the list of issues, available in our SVN > repository [2] (you will find below the current version of this file). Some > of these problems have been already reported and discussed in octave-dev. > > We decided to go ahead and upload the packages despite of the above, > essentially because we believe these are not real problems, just cases > needing clarifications. > > We thank the octave-dev developers in advance for fixing the issues listed. > > [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > [2] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-octave/octave-forge-pkgs/TODO?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 > > Rafael > can correspond.. It will therefore be extremely difficult to address this list of clarifications. However, it has always been assumed that short, uncopyrighted functions in octave-forge were public domain. Also if the packages include a COPYING file which that are obliged to with the Octave package manager, then doesn't that determine th licensing conditions for the unlicensed files? D. -- David Bateman David.Bateman@... Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) The information contained in this communication has been classified as: [x] General Business Information [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by Søren Hauberg
::
Rate this Message:
fre, 18 04 2008 kl. 14:49 +0200, skrev Rafael Laboissiere:
> In building the Debian packages, we found some licensing problems. We are > maintaining a TODO file with the list of issues, available in our SVN > repository [2] (you will find below the current version of this file). Some > of these problems have been already reported and discussed in octave-dev. [snip] > image: > src/__magick_read__.cc (no copyright statement) > > bwimage.cc (no license conditions) I can't find the 'bwimage.cc' file. Where is it located? Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by Rafael Laboissiere
::
Rate this Message:
* David Bateman <David.Bateman@...> [2008-04-18 15:03]:
> If the issues are license clarification, then only the original author > can correspond.. It will therefore be extremely difficult to address > this list of clarifications. Okay, let us hope that the original authors will react. > However, it has always been assumed that short, uncopyrighted functions in > octave-forge were public domain. Okay, but this should be stated somewhere in the tarballs. > Also if the packages include a COPYING file which that are obliged to with > the Octave package manager, then doesn't that determine th licensing > conditions for the unlicensed files? Yes, but some files lack the "Copyright (C) YYYY" notices, which can not be guessed easily in a multi-author package. -- Rafael ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by Andy Adler-8
::
Rate this Message:
On 18/04/2008, Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@...> wrote:
> plot: > src/grab.cc, src/gpick.cc > These files contain the statement > * This contains bits of code hacked from the > * X Consortium and from Octave. Please see the > * appropriate licences. The rest is mine, and > * you can do what you want with that part. > What should we do? These files are mine. I used examples from X and Octave when I wrote them, and my code is in the public domain. Is that clear? -- Andy Adler <adler@...> +1-613-520-2600x8785 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by Thomas Weber-8
::
Rate this Message:
On 18/04/08 15:16 +0200, Søren Hauberg wrote:
> fre, 18 04 2008 kl. 14:49 +0200, skrev Rafael Laboissiere: > > In building the Debian packages, we found some licensing problems. We are > > maintaining a TODO file with the list of issues, available in our SVN > > repository [2] (you will find below the current version of this file). Some > > of these problems have been already reported and discussed in octave-dev. > [snip] > > image: > > src/__magick_read__.cc (no copyright statement) > > > > bwimage.cc (no license conditions) > > I can't find the 'bwimage.cc' file. Where is it located? My bad, the filename is bwlabel.cc (from image/src) and it says: ==================================================================== bwimage.cc - octave module to label componenets of a binary image copyright 2002 Jeffrey E. Boyd ==================================================================== Thomas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by Rafael Laboissiere
::
Rate this Message:
* Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@...> [2008-04-18 14:49]:
> Several octave-forge packages have been updated to Debian unstable and are > waiting in the NEW queue [1] for ftp-master approval. > > In building the Debian packages, we found some licensing problems. We are > maintaining a TODO file with the list of issues, available in our SVN > repository [2] (you will find below the current version of this file). Some > of these problems have been already reported and discussed in octave-dev. > > We decided to go ahead and upload the packages despite of the above, > essentially because we believe these are not real problems, just cases > needing clarifications. Several packages have been accepted yesterday and are waiting in the incoming area [1]. It seems that the lacking copyright notice and/or licensing terms are not that problematic. However, six packages got rejected (communications [2], fixed [3], nnet [4], odepkg [5], optim [6], and vrml [7]) because the sources for the PDF and info files are missing in the tarballs. We (the DOG) will try to fix the problems by including the sources taken from SVN into the Debian source packages, but it would be good to fix it upstream. [1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-octave-devel@... [2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003807.html [3] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003819.html [4] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003827.html [5] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003822.html [6] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003817.html [7] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003862.html -- Rafael ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by David Bateman
::
Rate this Message:
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@...> [2008-04-18 14:49]: > > >> Several octave-forge packages have been updated to Debian unstable and are >> waiting in the NEW queue [1] for ftp-master approval. >> >> In building the Debian packages, we found some licensing problems. We are >> maintaining a TODO file with the list of issues, available in our SVN >> repository [2] (you will find below the current version of this file). Some >> of these problems have been already reported and discussed in octave-dev. >> >> We decided to go ahead and upload the packages despite of the above, >> essentially because we believe these are not real problems, just cases >> needing clarifications. >> > > Several packages have been accepted yesterday and are waiting in the > incoming area [1]. It seems that the lacking copyright notice and/or > licensing terms are not that problematic. However, six packages got > rejected (communications [2], fixed [3], nnet [4], odepkg [5], optim [6], > and vrml [7]) because the sources for the PDF and info files are missing in > the tarballs. > > We (the DOG) will try to fix the problems by including the sources taken > from SVN into the Debian source packages, but it would be good to fix it > upstream. > > [1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-octave-devel@... > [2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003807.html > [3] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003819.html > [4] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003827.html > [5] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003822.html > [6] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003817.html > [7] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003862.html > > authors of nnet, odepkg, optim and vrml don't include the sources themselves to the PDF file I'll make sure its done before the next release. D. -- David Bateman David.Bateman@... Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) The information contained in this communication has been classified as: [x] General Business Information [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by David Bateman
::
Rate this Message:
Andy Adler wrote:
> On 18/04/2008, Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@...> wrote: > >> plot: >> src/grab.cc, src/gpick.cc >> These files contain the statement >> * This contains bits of code hacked from the >> * X Consortium and from Octave. Please see the >> * appropriate licences. The rest is mine, and >> * you can do what you want with that part. >> What should we do? >> > > These files are mine. I used examples from X and Octave when > I wrote them, and my code is in the public domain. > > Is that clear? > with the latest gnuplot versions that trap the mouse events themselves and was X11 specific.. These functions were replaced with m-files of ginput.m, gtext.m and waitforbuttonpress.m that use gnuplot itself to management the mouse events that are under a GPL v3 license.. D. -- David Bateman David.Bateman@... Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) The information contained in this communication has been classified as: [x] General Business Information [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by David Bateman
::
Rate this Message:
David Bateman wrote:
> Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > >> Several packages have been accepted yesterday and are waiting in the >> incoming area [1]. It seems that the lacking copyright notice and/or >> licensing terms are not that problematic. However, six packages got >> rejected (communications [2], fixed [3], nnet [4], odepkg [5], optim [6], >> and vrml [7]) because the sources for the PDF and info files are missing in >> the tarballs. >> >> We (the DOG) will try to fix the problems by including the sources taken >> from SVN into the Debian source packages, but it would be good to fix it >> upstream. >> >> [1] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=pkg-octave-devel@... >> [2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003807.html >> [3] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003819.html >> [4] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003827.html >> [5] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003822.html >> [6] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003817.html >> [7] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-octave-devel/2008-April/003862.html >> >> >> > The communications and fixed packages are already fixed upstream. If the > authors of nnet, odepkg, optim and vrml don't include the sources > themselves to the PDF file I'll make sure its done before the next release. > > D. > > > packages all include the source files for their documentation in the SVN of octave-forge.. D. -- David Bateman David.Bateman@... Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) The information contained in this communication has been classified as: [x] General Business Information [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by Rafael Laboissiere
::
Rate this Message:
* David Bateman <David.Bateman@...> [2008-04-21 10:40]:
> David Bateman wrote: > > The communications and fixed packages are already fixed upstream. If the > > authors of nnet, odepkg, optim and vrml don't include the sources > > themselves to the PDF file I'll make sure its done before the next release. > > > Ok, it was trivial to do this.. The nnet, odepkg, optim and vrml > packages all include the source files for their documentation in the SVN > of octave-forge.. Thanks. Are you planning to release new versions of these packages? If it will be done soon, I will wait for it instead of patching the Debian packages. -- Rafael ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by David Bateman
::
Rate this Message:
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * David Bateman <David.Bateman@...> [2008-04-21 10:40]: > > >> David Bateman wrote: >> >>> The communications and fixed packages are already fixed upstream. If the >>> authors of nnet, odepkg, optim and vrml don't include the sources >>> themselves to the PDF file I'll make sure its done before the next release. >>> >>> >> Ok, it was trivial to do this.. The nnet, odepkg, optim and vrml >> packages all include the source files for their documentation in the SVN >> of octave-forge.. >> > > Thanks. Are you planning to release new versions of these packages? If it > will be done soon, I will wait for it instead of patching the Debian > packages. > > still a couple of outstanding issues before a release including * Patch for tukeywin sent to list, needs considering * Need to fix mingw build of fixed package prior to a release * See if I can't get the java package to work with jre 1.7.0 on an x86_64 linux machine (on a quick test I didn't) * -fPIC flags in SWIG based packages still don't seem to be quite right.. Anyone want to look at any of the above I'd appreciate it.. Regards David -- David Bateman David.Bateman@... Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) The information contained in this communication has been classified as: [x] General Business Information [ ] Motorola Internal Use Only [ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by Søren Hauberg
::
Rate this Message:
fre, 18 04 2008 kl. 18:53 +0200, skrev Thomas Weber:
> > > bwimage.cc (no license conditions) > > > > I can't find the 'bwimage.cc' file. Where is it located? > > My bad, the filename is bwlabel.cc (from image/src) and it says: > ==================================================================== > bwimage.cc - octave module to label componenets of a binary image > > copyright 2002 Jeffrey E. Boyd > ==================================================================== Sorry about the late reply. Assuming we'll have a release in the next couple of days, I won't have time to attend to this problem. By the next release I can reimplement this function (it shouldn't be too hard) and release it under the GPL. Is this okay, or do I need to implement the function before we make the next release? Søren ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
|
|
Re: Licensing problems in octave-forge pkgs
by Alexander Barth-3
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Rafael,
Sorry for my late reply. I added a copyright statement and license (GPL2 or later) to the files I wrote: octcdf: inst/example_netcdf.m, inst/example_opendap.m (no copyright statement) optiminterp: inst/example_optiminterp.m (no copyright statement) This is fixed thus in octcdf 1.0.10 and and optiminterp 0.3.1. Thanks and regards Alex On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@...> wrote: > Several octave-forge packages have been updated to Debian unstable and are > waiting in the NEW queue [1] for ftp-master approval. > > In building the Debian packages, we found some licensing problems. We are > maintaining a TODO file with the list of issues, available in our SVN > repository [2] (you will find below the current version of this file). Some > of these problems have been already reported and discussed in octave-dev. > > We decided to go ahead and upload the packages despite of the above, > essentially because we believe these are not real problems, just cases > needing clarifications. > > We thank the octave-dev developers in advance for fixing the issues listed. > > [1] http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > [2] http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-octave/octave-forge-pkgs/TODO?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 > > Rafael > > > ====================================================================== > copyright stuff (things that still need some review) > > audio: > aurecord.1 (Dirk Edenbuettel) > endpoint.doc (?) > sample.wav (GPL is not a good idea, unless that file was created with a hex editor) > src/Make* > > communications: > doc/comms.pdf (no source shipped (included in SVN)? => mail sent to octave-forge list) > inst/doc.info (same) > > econometrics: > kernel_density_cvscore.m (no license statement) > kernel_regression_cvscore (ditto) > fixed > > general: > inst/fcnchk.m (trivial fucntion, no copyright statement) > > gsl: > src/double_double_to_double.cc.template, > src/int_int_double_to_double.cc.template, > src/double_mode_to_double.cc.template, > src/int_to_double.cc.template > src/double_to_double.cc.template, > src/int_double_to_double.cc.template > (no copyright statement) > > image: > src/__magick_read__.cc (no copyright statement) > > bwimage.cc (no license conditions) > > linear-algebra: > src/test_gsvd.m (no copyright statement, it is just a test script) > > miscellaneous: > inst/grep.m, inst/inz.m, inst/nze.m, src/octave.dtd, > src/listencanfork.c (no copyright statement) > > src/listen.cc (no copyright statement, contains code taken > from the Unix Programming FAQ, Copyright (c) 2000 Andrew > Gierth, but without license conditions) > > nnet: > doc/pdf/neuralNetworkToolboxForOctaveUsersGuide.pdf (no > copyright statement, no sources) > > octcdf: > inst/example_netcdf.m, inst/example_opendap.m (no copyright statement) > > odepkg: > inst/doc.info (no copyright owner, no sources) > > optim: > inst/wsolve.m (no copyright owner) > > doc/mintoolkit.pdf (no copyright statement, no sources) > > doc/optim-mini-howto-2.pdf (no copyright year, no sources; > it's GFDL, is it DFSG-compatible?) > > optiminterp: > inst/example_optiminterp.m (no copyright statement) > > parallel: > src/swab.h (no copyright statement) > > plot: > inst/zoom.m (dummy file; I think it is okay to distribute > it without copyright statement) > > src/grab.cc, src/gpick.cc > These files contain the statement > * This contains bits of code hacked from the > * X Consortium and from Octave. Please see the > * appropriate licences. The rest is mine, and > * you can do what you want with that part. > What should we do? > > inst/ginput.m (seems to be GPL, but has unclear statement) > > signal: > inst/flattopwin.m (file in public domain but without copyright > statement) > inst/hann.m (one-line function without copyright statement) > > sockets: > src/sockets.cc (no copyright statement; should we assume the > same as in DESCRITPION?) > > symbolic: > doc/symbolic.html (no source and/or no copyright statement) > > vrml: > doc/vrml-mini-howto-1.pdf (no source) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > Octave-dev mailing list > Octave-dev@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Octave-dev mailing list Octave-dev@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/octave-dev |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |