|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Launching k3b takes 20 minutes.Hello everyone!
I have a frustrating problem I am trying to solve. I have been a Linux user for many years and I am currently using PCLinuxOS since its final version came available last year. One of my most used applications is k3b, and everything has been working well until very recently. I noticed a k3b upgrade was available in the PCLinuxOS repository, so (innocently enough) I upgraded k3b. Since then, k3b takes approximately 20 minutes to launch. I have been working with the PCLinuxOS Support Forum to try to figure this out, so far with no luck. Using the "top" console command, I determined that k3b was running the following series of commands: k3b cdrdao wodim dvd+rw-format growisofs genisoimage normalize readom sox transcode vcdxbuild vcdxminfo vcdxrip k3b (repeats) It takes about 10 minutes to run through the set once, then the set repeats. This accounts for the 20 minute launch time. After this, k3b comes up as expected. Does anyone here have any idea what is happening? Several suggestions have already been tried with no luck, including: Doing a full upgrade, Completely removing k3b and the commands shown above, and reinstalling the Synaptic package files. K3b acts the same whether launched from the KDE menu or from a console window. All other PCLinuxOS users claim they don't see this problem. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ K3b-user mailing list K3b-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/k3b-user |
|
|
Re: Launching k3b takes 20 minutes.On Saturday 12 July 2008 13:20:51 Donald Grbac wrote:
> > All other PCLinuxOS users claim they don't see this problem. > > Darn, you beat me to the punch <g>. I'm using K3b to copy some audio CDs as I type this, using PCLinuxOS and k3b ver 1.0.5. Are you using a version out of the testing repo, by any chance? -- 21:05:10 up 3 days, 8:31, running PCLinuxOS release 2007 (PCLinuxOS) for i586, kernel 2.6.22.17.tex2 Registered Linux user #324360 Folding@Home Team: Ex-Zoomies (31839) Today is what happened to yesterday. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ K3b-user mailing list K3b-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/k3b-user |
|
|
Re: Launching k3b takes 20 minutes.No, as far as I know I am not using the "testing repository". Synoptic lists several repositories. At first I assumed they were all mirrors of each other. Then I discovered the one I first chose had little in it, and the others had much more. So, I activated several for the search option. I didn't ask this question to the PCLinuxOS group, but should I just be using one repository? And if so, which one? A user wants access to all possible applications - of course. Glenn wrote: On Saturday 12 July 2008 13:20:51 Donald Grbac wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ K3b-user mailing list K3b-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/k3b-user |
|
|
Re: Launching k3b takes 20 minutes.On Sunday 13 July 2008 10:44:47 Donald Grbac wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. > > No, as far as I know I am not using the "testing repository". Synoptic > lists several repositories. At first I assumed they were all mirrors of > each other. Then I discovered the one I first chose had little in it, and > the others had much more. So, I activated several for the search option. > > I didn't ask this question to the PCLinuxOS group, but should I just be > using one repository? And if so, which one? A user wants access to all > possible applications - of course. > We're getting off-topic but, yes, one repo should do it (and that's what's recommended by Texstar and the rest of the developers.) If you want to live on the bleeding edge, you can manually add the testing repository into the list. I wouldn't recommend it for a system that you want to keep running without hiccups, though. -- 20:29:56 up 4 days, 7:56, running PCLinuxOS release 2007 (PCLinuxOS) for i586, kernel 2.6.22.17.tex2 Registered Linux user #324360 Folding@Home Team: Ex-Zoomies (31839) After watching my newly-retired dad spend two weeks learning how to make a new folder, it became obvious that "intuitive" mostly means "what the writer or speaker of intuitive likes". -- Bruce Ediger, bediger@..., on X the intuitiveness of a Mac interface ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ K3b-user mailing list K3b-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/k3b-user |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |