|
View:
New views
10 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Keeping Firefox+Flash from eating your CPUIn a recent issue of Salon, I read:
Luckily, there's a small add-on program for Firefox that lets the user prevent Flash files from running automatically when a page loads, and it turns Firefox into a stable, efficient browser. This appeared in: http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/scitech/2008/09/02/D92V0RV01_tec_tech_test_google_chrome/index.html Does anyone know what this application/applet/plugin is? Is it available for Linux? Thanks - jon -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: Keeping Firefox+Flash from eating your CPUOn Tue, 2008-09-02 at 21:42 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> In a recent issue of Salon, I read: > Luckily, there's a small add-on program for Firefox that lets > the user prevent Flash files from running automatically when a > page loads, and it turns Firefox into a stable, efficient > browser. > This appeared in: > http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/scitech/2008/09/02/D92V0RV01_tec_tech_test_google_chrome/index.html > > Does anyone know what this application/applet/plugin is? Is it > available for Linux? flashblock is what I use Craig -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: Keeping Firefox+Flash from eating your CPUJonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> In a recent issue of Salon, I read: > Luckily, there's a small add-on program for Firefox that lets > the user prevent Flash files from running automatically when a > page loads, and it turns Firefox into a stable, efficient > browser. > This appeared in: > http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/scitech/2008/09/02/D92V0RV01_tec_tech_test_google_chrome/index.html > > Does anyone know what this application/applet/plugin is? Is it > available for Linux? the name near the end): https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433 -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Never do today that which will become someone else's responsibility tomorrow. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
RE: Keeping Firefox+Flash from eating your CPUTalk to your Yahoo! Friends via Windows Live Messenger. Find Out How -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
why does hotmail clump my spaced sentences on reply? sorry repeatwhat is really great is the ad block but that doesn't always allow a new entry to be added to the block list! ---------------------------------------- > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 00:56:29 -0400 > From: tmz@... > To: fedora-list@... > Subject: Re: Keeping Firefox+Flash from eating your CPU > > Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: >> In a recent issue of Salon, I read: >> Luckily, there's a small add-on program for Firefox that lets >> the user prevent Flash files from running automatically when a >> page loads, and it turns Firefox into a stable, efficient >> browser. >> This appeared in: >> http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/scitech/2008/09/02/D92V0RV01_tec_tech_test_google_chrome/index.html >> >> Does anyone know what this application/applet/plugin is? Is it >> available for Linux? > > They're talking about Flashblock I believe (the article even mentions > the name near the end): > > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/433 > > -- > Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Never do today that which will become someone else's responsibility > tomorrow. > _________________________________________________________________ Talk to your Yahoo! Friends via Windows Live Messenger. Find out how. http://www.windowslive.com/explore/messenger?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger_yahoo_082008 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: Keeping Firefox+Flash from eating your CPUOn 03Sep2008 00:35, landon kelsey <landonmkelsey@...> wrote:
| what is really great is the ad block | but that doesn't always allow a new entry | to be added to the block list! Ad block is a blacklist (you ad stuff you want blocked). Flashblock is a whitelist (blocks all flash, you add things you will let run). I personally prefer the latter. NoScript is also very useful. BTW, in FF3 (on a Mac) the block menu item appears to be missing from mousing over the flash (it's available in FF2). Does anyone know about this? -- Cameron Simpson <cs@...> DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ Tis better to have test ridden and lost, than to never have test ridden at all. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: why does hotmail clump my spaced sentences on reply? sorry repeatOn Wed, 2008-09-03 at 00:37 -0500, landon kelsey wrote:
> what is really great is the ad block > > but that doesn't always allow a new entry > > to be added to the block list! To answer the question that you posed in the subject line, which is NOT the place to write your message: Probably because it's crap... Seriously, Hotmail has excelled in being awful, in a plethora of ways, for all of its life. There's also various other mail clients/services which do poor jobs when it comes to converting plain text mail to HTML mail, and vice versa. Real plain text mail is the true WYSIWYG. What you type is what you send, not some guess at what it'll be received as. NB: Since someone's bound to comment on my yahoo email address, I don't think that they're much better, just slightly. And I'm not actually using yahoo, it's just the address I signed up to this list with. -- [tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: Keeping Firefox+Flash from eating your CPUOn Tue, 2008-09-02 at 21:42 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
> In a recent issue of Salon, I read: > Luckily, there's a small add-on program for Firefox that lets > the user prevent Flash files from running automatically when a > page loads, and it turns Firefox into a stable, efficient > browser. > This appeared in: > http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/scitech/2008/09/02/D92V0RV01_tec_tech_test_google_chrome/index.html > > Does anyone know what this application/applet/plugin is? Is it > available for Linux? Flashblock and Noscript are both good. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: Keeping Firefox+Flash from eating your CPUOn Wed, 2008-09-03 at 13:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 21:42 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > In a recent issue of Salon, I read: > > Luckily, there's a small add-on program for Firefox that lets > > the user prevent Flash files from running automatically when a > > page loads, and it turns Firefox into a stable, efficient > > browser. > > This appeared in: > > http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/scitech/2008/09/02/D92V0RV01_tec_tech_test_google_chrome/index.html > > > > Does anyone know what this application/applet/plugin is? Is it > > available for Linux? > > Flashblock and Noscript are both good. > > poc > Investment company. It took a while to realize that noscript will prevent you from logging in to any site without your specific authorization -- ======================================================================= If only I could be respected without having to be respectable. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam@... -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
|
|
Re: Keeping Firefox+Flash from eating your CPUOn 03Sep2008 16:03, Aaron Konstam <akonstam@...> wrote:
| On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 13:59 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: | > Flashblock and Noscript are both good. | | NOSCRIPT is too good. I was unable to login to the web site of my | Investment company. It took a while to realize that noscript will | prevent you from logging in to any site without your specific | authorization This is a rather gross overstatement. NoScript blocks javascript by default, and it is easy to whitelist sites you decide to trust. I've never had it "prevent you from logging in to any site without your specific authorization"; it is not even clear what that means. Do you mean form prefilling? Do you mean persistent cookies? Do you mean javascript mediated login forms? Something else entirely? Some detail about your problems would be informative. Form prefilling is a security issue; it can let "onload" javascript handlers steal your passwords from the prefilled form. I run the "Secure Login" extension to control form prefilling and "CS Lite" to control cookies. Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson <cs@...> DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@... To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |