JSF implementation selection

View: New views
6 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

JSF implementation selection

by itay sahar :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

hi all,
I would like you share with us the best JSF implemetation.
(myfaces,icefaces) and explian
why you prefer one above the other.

Thanks
Itay

RE: JSF implementation selection

by Praful Sinha :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Icefaces provides you a functionality of ajax embedded in it.
But Myfaces did not.

You can also you tomahawk for more enhanced tag lib.

Any trouble can contact me on praful.sinha@...

Praful Sinha.

-----Original Message-----
From: itay sahar [mailto:itay.sahar@...]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 8:09 PM
To: users@...
Subject: JSF implementation selection

hi all,
I would like you share with us the best JSF implemetation.
(myfaces,icefaces) and explian
why you prefer one above the other.

Thanks
Itay



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@...
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...


Re: JSF implementation selection

by Ingmar Lötzsch :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Is it possible to use Icefaces and Tomahawk together?

Thank you
Ingmar

Praful Sinha schrieb:

> Icefaces provides you a functionality of ajax embedded in it.
> But Myfaces did not.
>
> You can also you tomahawk for more enhanced tag lib.
>
> Any trouble can contact me on praful.sinha@...
>
> Praful Sinha.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: itay sahar [mailto:itay.sahar@...]
> Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 8:09 PM
> To: users@...
> Subject: JSF implementation selection
>
> hi all,
> I would like you share with us the best JSF implemetation.
> (myfaces,icefaces) and explian
> why you prefer one above the other.
>
> Thanks
> Itay
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@...
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@...
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...


Re: JSF implementation selection

by redcoat :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

We are running Tomcat 5.5 using the SSO Valve.

We are hitting a strange situation, however, if we set the session timeout
on our context to be less than the default 30 minutes eg 5 mins.

The valve has the following check:

if (((session.getMaxInactiveInterval() > 0) && (System.currentTimeMillis()
- session.getLastAccessedTimeInternal() <
      session.getMaxInactiveInterval() * 1000)))
{
        // Logged out, kill em all
}
else
{
        // Timed out, just stop tracking
}

However, from the debug we added, session.getMaxInactiveInterval() is
returning the default 30, not the 5 minute timeout of the context the
session was associated with.

Can anyone shed any light on the situation?

cheers,

David

session.getMaxInactiveInterval() always returns default?

by redcoat :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Sorry - wrong title obviously...

cheers,

David




dhay@...
05/09/2008 08:35 PM
Please respond to
"Tomcat Users List" <users@...>


To
"Tomcat Users List" <users@...>
cc

Subject
Re: JSF implementation selection





We are running Tomcat 5.5 using the SSO Valve.

We are hitting a strange situation, however, if we set the session timeout
on our context to be less than the default 30 minutes eg 5 mins.

The valve has the following check:

if (((session.getMaxInactiveInterval() > 0) && (System.currentTimeMillis()
- session.getLastAccessedTimeInternal() <
session.getMaxInactiveInterval() * 1000)))
{
// Logged out, kill em all
}
else
{
// Timed out, just stop tracking
}

However, from the debug we added, session.getMaxInactiveInterval() is
returning the default 30, not the 5 minute timeout of the context the
session was associated with.

Can anyone shed any light on the situation?

cheers,

David


Re: session.getMaxInactiveInterval() always returns default?

by Christopher Schultz-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David,

dhay@... wrote:
| Sorry - wrong title obviously...

... and wrong thread. Please post to a new thread instead of hijacking
an old one.

- -chris

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkgnj2AACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBuaACfYy9Cz4Xb5/LIrtAUgagSBfMs
NUcAn2Cfu4+iPRZXHe3hOsCwkDDZZJI7
=EdoE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@...
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...