|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
JSF implementation selectionhi all,
I would like you share with us the best JSF implemetation. (myfaces,icefaces) and explian why you prefer one above the other. Thanks Itay |
|
|
RE: JSF implementation selectionIcefaces provides you a functionality of ajax embedded in it. But Myfaces did not. You can also you tomahawk for more enhanced tag lib. Any trouble can contact me on praful.sinha@... Praful Sinha. -----Original Message----- From: itay sahar [mailto:itay.sahar@...] Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 8:09 PM To: users@... Subject: JSF implementation selection hi all, I would like you share with us the best JSF implemetation. (myfaces,icefaces) and explian why you prefer one above the other. Thanks Itay --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@... To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: JSF implementation selectionIs it possible to use Icefaces and Tomahawk together?
Thank you Ingmar Praful Sinha schrieb: > Icefaces provides you a functionality of ajax embedded in it. > But Myfaces did not. > > You can also you tomahawk for more enhanced tag lib. > > Any trouble can contact me on praful.sinha@... > > Praful Sinha. > > -----Original Message----- > From: itay sahar [mailto:itay.sahar@...] > Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 8:09 PM > To: users@... > Subject: JSF implementation selection > > hi all, > I would like you share with us the best JSF implemetation. > (myfaces,icefaces) and explian > why you prefer one above the other. > > Thanks > Itay > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@... > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@... To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: JSF implementation selectionWe are running Tomcat 5.5 using the SSO Valve.
We are hitting a strange situation, however, if we set the session timeout on our context to be less than the default 30 minutes eg 5 mins. The valve has the following check: if (((session.getMaxInactiveInterval() > 0) && (System.currentTimeMillis() - session.getLastAccessedTimeInternal() < session.getMaxInactiveInterval() * 1000))) { // Logged out, kill em all } else { // Timed out, just stop tracking } However, from the debug we added, session.getMaxInactiveInterval() is returning the default 30, not the 5 minute timeout of the context the session was associated with. Can anyone shed any light on the situation? cheers, David |
|
|
session.getMaxInactiveInterval |
|
|
Re: session.getMaxInactiveInterval |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |