JAXB version bundled with JDK 1.6 update 5

View: New views
4 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

JAXB version bundled with JDK 1.6 update 5

by Tatu Saloranta-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I noticed that the unofficial user's guide had references to JAXB RI
versions included in first versions of JDK 1.6,
but not for update 5. Is it still version 2.1.3 (assuming u4 had
2.1.3) or a later version? Also, is there an easy way to figure out
version included either programmatically or by looking at JRE
deployment?

Also: I assume replacing bundled version should work by just adding
reference implementation jar in classpath, and letting service
introspection work its magic and use this one, not the jdk-bundled
one. Is this correct?

-+ Tatu +-

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: JAXB version bundled with JDK 1.6 update 5

by Bhakti Mehta :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



Tatu Saloranta wrote:
> I noticed that the unofficial user's guide had references to JAXB RI
> versions included in first versions of JDK 1.6,
> but not for update 5. Is it still version 2.1.3 (assuming u4 had
> 2.1.3) or a later version? Also, is there an easy way to figure out
> version included either programmatically or by looking at JRE
> deployment?
>  
I checked in U5. it is 2.1.3 You can check xjc -version in the
JAVA_HOME/bin and  that will confirm
> Also: I assume replacing bundled version should work by just adding
> reference implementation jar in classpath, and letting service
> introspection work its magic and use this one, not the jdk-bundled
> one. Is this correct?
>
>  
Yes that is right
Regards,
Bhakti
> -+ Tatu +-
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...
>
>
>  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: JAXB version bundled with JDK 1.6 update 5

by Tatu Saloranta-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Bhakti Mehta <Bhakti.Mehta@...> wrote:

>
>
>  Tatu Saloranta wrote:
>
> > I noticed that the unofficial user's guide had references to JAXB RI
> > versions included in first versions of JDK 1.6,
> > but not for update 5. Is it still version 2.1.3 (assuming u4 had
> > 2.1.3) or a later version? Also, is there an easy way to figure out
> > version included either programmatically or by looking at JRE
> > deployment?
> >
>  I checked in U5. it is 2.1.3 You can check xjc -version in the
> JAVA_HOME/bin and  that will confirm

Thanks! This will make it easier to verify the version.

I assume that it is unlikely that later builds of 1.6 would contain
more recent version than 2.1.3? That's ok since I can just include
unbundled JAXB RI, just need to make sure not to rely on bundled one.

> > Also: I assume replacing bundled version should work by just adding
> > reference implementation jar in classpath, and letting service
> > introspection work its magic and use this one, not the jdk-bundled
> > one. Is this correct?
> >
>  Yes that is right

Very cool. I like things that "just work" :-)

-+ Tatu +-

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...


Re: JAXB version bundled with JDK 1.6 update 5

by meinc :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Bhakti Mehta wrote:
I checked in U5. it is 2.1.3 You can check xjc -version in the
JAVA_HOME/bin and  that will confirm
> Also: I assume replacing bundled version should work by just adding
> reference implementation jar in classpath, and letting service
> introspection work its magic and use this one, not the jdk-bundled
> one. Is this correct?
>
>  
Yes that is right
Regards,
Bhakti
There might be some problems if beahviour is added to the generated classes and an ObjectFactory needs to be used. See my post http://www.nabble.com/transparently-switch-between-JDK-internal-JAXB-and-2.1.7-on-classpath-to18587227.html. I do have a workaround which I described in this post but I'm still not sure whether one should fix the problem this way.