Fwd: [Crm-sig] MIDAS Heritage consultation

View: New views
1 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Fwd: [Crm-sig] MIDAS Heritage consultation

by Stefano Costa :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.
Some of you might find this interesting:

Best,
Stefano

----- Messaggio inoltrato da "LEE, Edmund" <Edmund.Lee@...>
-----
    Data: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 16:48:57 +0100
    Da: "LEE, Edmund" <Edmund.Lee@...>
Rispondi-A: "LEE, Edmund" <Edmund.Lee@...>
 Oggetto: [Crm-sig] MIDAS Heritage consultation
      A: crm-sig@...

Dear CRM colleagues,



Those with an interest in the built or archaeological heritage may wish
to review the current version of the MIDAS Heritage data standard, which
is currently available for comment at
http://www.fish-forum.info/midaspr.htm until 29th June.



MIDAS Heritage has been informed by the development of the CIDOC CRM,
and the MIDAS XML schemas, party of the FISH Interoperability Toolkit
(see http://heritage-standards.org <http://heritage-standards.org/>  .



The formal connection between MIDAS and the CRM-SIG is Matthew Stiff,
and I believe (put me right if I've got this wrong Matthew!) that he
will be reviewing MIDAS Heritage specifically for  CRM conformance.



Some features of MIDAS Heritage that may be of interest:-



There has been a more rigorous grouping of units of information under
fairly self-contained Information Groups. Within each group there are
mandatory and optional units.

The Information groups are themselves gathered into themes which are
closely identifiable with the CRM e.g. Heritage Asset (= 'stuff' I
think); Events; Actors; Timespans etc.

There is more emphasis on the required and optional relationships
between these information groups. It feels more like topic maps and less
like relational databases.



Please pass any formal comment on MIDAS Heritage to
midas@...  though I would welcome any informal
discussion on this list.



Best wishes



Edmund Lee

English Heritage




_________________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views
which are not the
views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. If you have received it in
error, please delete it
from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose
the information in
any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English Heritage may
become publicly available.


----- Fine messaggio inoltrato -----


Stefano Costa
http://www.iosa.it * Software Libero per l'Archeologia
Jabber: steko@...

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Dear CRM colleagues,

 

Those with an interest in the built or archaeological heritage may wish
to review the current version of the MIDAS Heritage data standard, which
is currently available for comment at
http://www.fish-forum.info/midaspr.htm until 29th June.

 

MIDAS Heritage has been informed by the development of the CIDOC CRM,
and the MIDAS XML schemas, party of the FISH Interoperability Toolkit
(see http://heritage-standards.org <http://heritage-standards.org/>  .

 

The formal connection between MIDAS and the CRM-SIG is Matthew Stiff,
and I believe (put me right if I've got this wrong Matthew!) that he
will be reviewing MIDAS Heritage specifically for  CRM conformance.

 

Some features of MIDAS Heritage that may be of interest:-

 

There has been a more rigorous grouping of units of information under
fairly self-contained Information Groups. Within each group there are
mandatory and optional units.

The Information groups are themselves gathered into themes which are
closely identifiable with the CRM e.g. Heritage Asset (= 'stuff' I
think); Events; Actors; Timespans etc.

There is more emphasis on the required and optional relationships
between these information groups. It feels more like topic maps and less
like relational databases.

 

Please pass any formal comment on MIDAS Heritage to
midas@...  though I would welcome any informal
discussion on this list.

 

Best wishes

 

Edmund Lee

English Heritage

 


_________________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the
views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it
from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in
any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English Heritage may become publicly available.


Dear CRM colleagues,

 

Those with an interest in the built or archaeological heritage may wish to review the current version of the MIDAS Heritage data standard, which is currently available for comment at http://www.fish-forum.info/midaspr.htm until 29th June.

 

MIDAS Heritage has been informed by the development of the CIDOC CRM, and the MIDAS XML schemas, party of the FISH Interoperability Toolkit (see http://heritage-standards.org .

 

The formal connection between MIDAS and the CRM-SIG is Matthew Stiff, and I believe (put me right if I’ve got this wrong Matthew!) that he will be reviewing MIDAS Heritage specifically for  CRM conformance.

 

Some features of MIDAS Heritage that may be of interest:-

 

There has been a more rigorous grouping of units of information under fairly self-contained Information Groups. Within each group there are mandatory and optional units.

The Information groups are themselves gathered into themes which are closely identifiable with the CRM e.g. Heritage Asset (= ‘stuff’ I think); Events; Actors; Timespans etc.

There is more emphasis on the required and optional relationships between these information groups. It feels more like topic maps and less like relational databases.

 

Please pass any formal comment on MIDAS Heritage to midas@...  though I would welcome any informal discussion on this list.

 

Best wishes

 

Edmund Lee

English Heritage

 



This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the
views of English Heritage unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it
from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in
any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to English Heritage may become publicly available.
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
Crm-sig@...
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig


--
Mailing list info: http://lists.linux.it/listinfo/archaeology