Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

View: New views
20 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  
< Prev | 1 - 2 | Next >

Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Gordon Joly :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



Very poor article seems to have surfaced today...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mom_and_Dad

How did that slip through?

Gordo

--
"Think Feynman"/////////
http://pobox.com/~gordo/
gordon.joly@...///

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Parent Message unknown Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Thomas Dalton :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

2008/9/24 Gordon Joly <gordon.joly@...>:
>
>
> Very poor article seems to have surfaced today...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mom_and_Dad
>
> How did that slip through?

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Mom_and_Dad

Are there any valid concerns raised there that weren't corrected?

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Philip Sandifer-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On Sep 24, 2008, at 5:01 AM, Gordon Joly wrote:

>
>
> Very poor article seems to have surfaced today...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mom_and_Dad
>
> How did that slip through?

What's the problem with it?

-Phil

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Al Tally :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton@...>wrote:
>
>
> Are there any valid concerns raised there that weren't corrected?


Bear in mind, the article was made featured in May 2007. So it could have
changed significantly. Why did it take so long to be on the front page?

--
Alex
(User:Majorly)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Al Tally :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Al Tally <majorly.wiki@...>wrote:
>
> Bear in mind, the article was made featured in May 2007. So it could have
> changed significantly. Why did it take so long to be on the front page?
>

Here's a diff showing the changes made between when it was promoted and
today:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mom_and_Dad&diff=240673526&oldid=128415356

--
Alex
(User:Majorly)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Philip Sandifer-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On Sep 24, 2008, at 9:20 AM, Al Tally wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton@...
> >wrote:
>>
>>
>> Are there any valid concerns raised there that weren't corrected?
>
>
> Bear in mind, the article was made featured in May 2007. So it could  
> have
> changed significantly. Why did it take so long to be on the front  
> page?

Because there were a bunch of other feature articles that people were  
clamoring to get on the front page, whereas this one was pushed  
through by Badlydrawnjeff, who soon after wasn't around to ask for it  
to be frontpaged?

-Phil

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Ron Ritzman :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton@...> wrote:

>> Very poor article seems to have surfaced today...

>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mom_and_Dad

>> How did that slip through?

> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Mom_and_Dad
>
> Are there any valid concerns raised there that weren't corrected?

Here's the version that was promoted...

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mom_and_Dad&oldid=128415356

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Stephen Bain :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Philip Sandifer <snowspinner@...> wrote:
>
> What's the problem with it?

Yes, is this a question of taste or is there something of substance
that's wrong with it?

I find that the diversity of featured articles, particularly the ones
that get on to the main page, makes for an excellent source of
esoteric knowledge.

--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain@...

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by John Lee-14 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Philip Sandifer <snowspinner@...>wrote:

>
> On Sep 24, 2008, at 9:20 AM, Al Tally wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton@...
> > >wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Are there any valid concerns raised there that weren't corrected?
> >
> >
> > Bear in mind, the article was made featured in May 2007. So it could
> > have
> > changed significantly. Why did it take so long to be on the front
> > page?
>
> Because there were a bunch of other feature articles that people were
> clamoring to get on the front page, whereas this one was pushed
> through by Badlydrawnjeff, who soon after wasn't around to ask for it
> to be frontpaged?
>
> -Phil


Bear in mind that a lot of articles take a long while to be featured. When I
was active in the process two or three years ago, the waiting list was
already easily a month long, if not more. I'm not sure how it works now but
it can only have gotten lengthier.

Johnleemk
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Stephen Bain :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:36 PM, John Lee <johnleemk@...> wrote:
>
> Bear in mind that a lot of articles take a long while to be featured. When I
> was active in the process two or three years ago, the waiting list was
> already easily a month long, if not more. I'm not sure how it works now but
> it can only have gotten lengthier.

The more relevant number is the net change in featured articles over
time (that's promotions minus delistings). Every month this year it's
been quite a bit more than the number of days in that month; indeed
it's been that way since at least early 2006.

We're never going to catch up! (A bad thing because not all FAs will
be main page featured; a good thing because there are so many more
FAs.)

See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_statistics

--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain@...

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Thomas Dalton :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

> We're never going to catch up! (A bad thing because not all FAs will
> be main page featured; a good thing because there are so many more
> FAs.)

We could start featuring two articles a day. One from a traditional
encyclopaedic topic and one from a pop-culture topic, perhaps.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Al Tally :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton@...>wrote:
>
>
> We could start featuring two articles a day. One from a traditional
> encyclopaedic topic and one from a pop-culture topic, perhaps.


Maybe with the new main page design, a second FA space could be
incorporated.

--
Alex
(User:Majorly)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by David Gerard-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

2008/9/24 Al Tally <majorly.wiki@...>:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton@...>wrote:

>> We could start featuring two articles a day. One from a traditional
>> encyclopaedic topic and one from a pop-culture topic, perhaps.

> Maybe with the new main page design, a second FA space could be
> incorporated.


[[WT:FAC]] and [[Talk:Main Page]] would be the places to run it past,
if Raul654 (the Featured Articles director) thinks we can reliably
supply 730 new FAs a year for the foreseeable future. (cc'd to him)


- d.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Parent Message unknown Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Flameviper Velifang :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

What makes me uncomfortable about this is that it's such a (for the most part) insignificant article being promoted to a FA and on the main page. Not only is it eerily short, its subject is incredibly obscure. Many of the C1K are still at start-class and B-class, yet people still get this to the front page. Not saying it's bad; a meaningless featured article is better than not having one at all, but I think it would be greatly beneficial to the project and our public perception if we were to put more stress on the core articles. When people say "Wikipedia is a bad resource", they're not talking about a social hygiene movie from 1946, they're talking about the 118 chemical elements, many of whose articles are B or Start.
 
(I was working on Lutetium; halfway through my research and before I could reformat the article I got indefinitely banned).


     
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by geni :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

2008/9/24 Flameviper Velifang <theflameysnake@...>:
> What makes me uncomfortable about this is that it's such a (for the most part) insignificant article being promoted to a FA and on the main page. Not only is it eerily short, its subject is incredibly obscure.

A lot of the time it is less hassle to write about obscure topics. Few
people trying to POV push and less worrying about what rates
inclusion.


--
geni

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Philip Sandifer-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On Sep 24, 2008, at 12:22 PM, Flameviper Velifang wrote:

> What makes me uncomfortable about this is that it's such a (for the  
> most part) insignificant article being promoted to a FA and on the  
> main page. Not only is it eerily short, its subject is incredibly  
> obscure.

I disagree on the obscurity - the main academic book on trash cinema  
has 17 separate index mentions of it, including two separate ten page  
sections on the film.

-Phil

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Oldak Quill :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

2008/9/24 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton@...>:
>> We're never going to catch up! (A bad thing because not all FAs will
>> be main page featured; a good thing because there are so many more
>> FAs.)
>
> We could start featuring two articles a day. One from a traditional
> encyclopaedic topic and one from a pop-culture topic, perhaps.

That's a false division of content. Wikipedia merely has more space
for pop-culture topics than traditional paper encyclopedias. Anyway,
pop culture on Wikipedia is one of our greatest assets - it attracts a
lot of new users who would not otherwise read encyclopedia articles.

--
Oldak Quill (oldakquill@...)

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Charlotte Webb :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On 9/24/08, Philip Sandifer <snowspinner@...> wrote:
> I disagree on the obscurity - the main academic book on trash cinema
> has 17 separate index mentions of it, including two separate ten page
> sections on the film.

In other words, a lot more could have been written, but unfortunately wasn't. :/

—C.W.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Philip Sandifer-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


On Sep 24, 2008, at 1:30 PM, Charlotte Webb wrote:

> On 9/24/08, Philip Sandifer <snowspinner@...> wrote:
>> I disagree on the obscurity - the main academic book on trash cinema
>> has 17 separate index mentions of it, including two separate ten page
>> sections on the film.
>
> In other words, a lot more could have been written, but  
> unfortunately wasn't. :/

Half of the article's citations are to that book.

-Phil

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Re: Featured article - "Mom and Dad"

by Charlotte Webb :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On 9/24/08, Oldak Quill <oldakquill@...> wrote:
>> We could start featuring two articles a day. One from a traditional
>> encyclopaedic topic and one from a pop-culture topic, perhaps.
>
> That's a false division of content. Wikipedia merely has more space
> for pop-culture topics than traditional paper encyclopedias. Anyway,
> pop culture on Wikipedia is one of our greatest assets - it attracts a
> lot of new users who would not otherwise read encyclopedia articles.

It also attracts deletionists who would otherwise have nothing to
bitch about, or would they find something else? *shrug*

—C.W.

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@...
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l