ETA for nautilus + gnome-applets + epiphany-browser?

[Tshepang Lekhonkhobe]

Hi,

I see new versions (>2.20) of subject-mentioned apps in Experimental
and wonder what problems hinders them from being uploaded in Sid.

Otherwise, when can I expect them in Sid? Plans?

--
my place on the web:
floss-and-misc.blogspot.com


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

Am Samstag, den 05.04.2008, 17:00 +0200 schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
> Hi,
>
> I see new versions (>2.20) of subject-mentioned apps in Experimental
> and wonder what problems hinders them from being uploaded in Sid.

I am wondering about the same. At the moment, all nautilus extensions
don't work as they put their libraries
into /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0 whereas nautilus 2.22 looks for
them in /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0

I wonder if it would be possible to upload nautilus 2.22 to sid and have
everything rebuilt against it.

Thanks,

Johannes


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Paul Wise-3]

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Johannes Rohr <jorohr@...> wrote:

>  I am wondering about the same. At the moment, all nautilus extensions
>  don't work as they put their libraries
>  into /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0 whereas nautilus 2.22 looks for
>  them in /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0

I think you made a typo there - both paths seem to be the same?

>  I wonder if it would be possible to upload nautilus 2.22 to sid and have
>  everything rebuilt against it.

I would love to see that, I'm looking forward to the FUSE goodness
with the new gvfs, but there doesn't seem to be a UI for it apart from
nautilus 2.22.

--
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Am Donnerstag, den 01.05.2008, 03:00 +0200 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Johannes Rohr <jorohr@...> wrote:
>
> >  I am wondering about the same. At the moment, all nautilus extensions
> >  don't work as they put their libraries
> >  into /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0 whereas nautilus 2.22 looks for
> >  them in /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0
>
> I think you made a typo there - both paths seem to be the same?

Yes, for nautilus 2.22, it is "extensions-2.0". Actually, most old
extensions seem to work, when I create symlinks from the so files
in /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0 to extensions-2.0. The only one that
causes trouble is the gnome-mount extension.

Thanks,

Johannes


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...