|
View:
New views
9 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
DWR and GuiceSo has anyone else been thinking about how to integrate DWR and Guice? I have!
Here's what I have so far:
My sample DWR webapp uses no XML beyond web.xml, which seems to be the Guice Grail. The slightly odd thing is that @RemoteProxy classes use DWR scoping to decide when they should be created, but everything injected into them uses Guice scopes. --tim |
|
|
Re: DWR and GuiceCool - so would you like to submit some classes for Guice support? Joe. On 3/21/07, tpeierls <tim@...> wrote: So has anyone else been thinking about how to integrate DWR and Guice? I have! |
|
|
Re: DWR and GuiceYes, I would! :-) Here they are. Not sure what to do about copyright notices and @author tags. Currently the former say "Copyright 2007 Tim Peierls" and there are none of the latter. But I'm happy to change them to whatever Joe says. The code requires 2.0.rc3 or better (because it uses the most recent FluentConfigurator). --tim |
|
|
Re: DWR and GuiceCool. I've checked it into the java5 folder. Shall I give you CVS commit so you can maintain it? http://getahead.org/dwr/development/contributor Joe. On 3/28/07, tpeierls <tim@...> wrote:
|
|
|
Re: DWR and GuiceOn @author tags - please could you copy the style used elsewhere. I'm not too fussed about what happens for the header comment. The advantage of consistent @author is that if we need to contact the authors for some copyright reason, we can script it easily. Joe. On 3/29/07, Joe Walker <joe@...> wrote:
|
|
|
Re: DWR and GuiceOK, I'll make a pass for the @author tags and general style uniformity. And yes, please, to CVS commit.
I'd like to add Scopes to the DWR-Guice package to match the DWR scopes, so we'd have a type-safe way to put a remoted object in a DWR scope at bind time (and we could use scope annotations consistently instead of the scope parameter of @RemoteProxy). If anyone has other ideas please let me know. --tim
|
|
|
Re: DWR and GuiceWhat's your java.net ID? Joe. On 3/29/07, tpeierls <tim@...
> wrote:
|
|
|
Re: DWR and Guicetpeierls
|
|
|
Re: DWR and GuiceDone.
On 3/29/07, tpeierls <tim@...> wrote:
|
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |