Where should I start looking if I want to 'enhance' the dwr wire
protocol?
What I'd like to do add support for dot notation properties.
So for example, for this request:
c0-id=0
c0-e1=string: 999
c0-param0=Object_Object:{myobj.id:reference:c0-e1}
I'd like dwr assume that this is a nested object called 'myobj',
instantiate it for me, then call setId() on it. The exacly same
behaviour as it'd have if it were a 'normal' nested reference in
dwr's protocol.
Is this doable?
Of course, this would all be unnnessary if dwr's json support is
showing up anytime soon. Any ETA/progress on that?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
dev-help@...
