CVS up

[Joe Walker-3]

There are a few people with stuff about to go into CVS:
- Tim: Guice update
- Mike: Some util.js updates
- Brendan: Spring updates

I've just checked in my reverse ajax updates. I'm going away for the weekend, but before I go I'll sync to HEAD in CVS and post a pre-release. Unless there are serious issues with that, we can call it RC4 next week.
I think we should have quite a clean slate then.

Joe.

[mikewse]

Just so you know I am now finally back at working with util.js (and have now scanned through my backlog on the mailing list).

Best regards

Mike

---

From: joseph.walker@... [mailto:joseph.walker@...] On Behalf Of Joe Walker
Sent: den 6 april 2007 12:22
To: dev@...
Subject: [dwr-dev] CVS up

There are a few people with stuff about to go into CVS:
- Tim: Guice update
- Mike: Some util.js updates
- Brendan: Spring updates

I've just checked in my reverse ajax updates. I'm going away for the weekend, but before I go I'll sync to HEAD in CVS and post a pre-release. Unless there are serious issues with that, we can call it RC4 next week.
I think we should have quite a clean slate then.

Joe.

[Joe Walker-3]

Thanks Mike.
No hassle, but to help me plan releases, when do you think you will be able to do some check-ins?

Joe.

On 4/10/07, Mike Wilson <mikewse@...> wrote:

Just so you know I am now finally back at working with util.js (and have now scanned through my backlog on the mailing list).

Best regards

Mike

---

From: joseph.walker@... [mailto:joseph.walker@...] On Behalf Of Joe Walker
Sent: den 6 april 2007 12:22
To: dev@...
Subject: [dwr-dev] CVS up

There are a few people with stuff about to go into CVS:
- Tim: Guice update
- Mike: Some util.js updates
- Brendan: Spring updates

I've just checked in my reverse ajax updates. I'm going away for the weekend, but before I go I'll sync to HEAD in CVS and post a pre-release. Unless there are serious issues with that, we can call it RC4 next week.
I think we should have quite a clean slate then.

Joe.

[mikewse]

My checkins will (hopefully) look something like this:

 

Wednesday or Thursday: toDescriptiveString()

I am fixing trailing "," plus a bunch of other things I have been thinking to do for a long time. My plan is to initially commit it as toDescriptiveString2() so we all can discuss if my updates are for better or worse.

 

Later this week:

JAVA.NET-97 (could you comment my suggestion?)

JAVA.NET-98

JAVA.NET-102

JAVA.NET-106

 

Next week I'll look through the remaining issues and make a plan for them.

 

Best regards

Mike

---

From: joseph.walker@... [mailto:joseph.walker@...] On Behalf Of Joe Walker
Sent: den 10 april 2007 16:34
To: dev@...
Subject: Re: [dwr-dev] CVS up

Thanks Mike.
No hassle, but to help me plan releases, when do you think you will be able to do some check-ins?

Joe.

[Joe Walker-3]

On 4/10/07, Mike Wilson <mikewse@...> wrote:

My checkins will (hopefully) look something like this:

 

Wednesday or Thursday: toDescriptiveString()

I am fixing trailing "," plus a bunch of other things I have been thinking to do for a long time. My plan is to initially commit it as toDescriptiveString2() so we all can discuss if my updates are for better or worse.

 

Later this week:

JAVA.NET-97 (could you comment my suggestion?)

Your suggestion looks fine, although it is potentially breaking - it is a corner case for most people.

JAVA.NET-98

JAVA.NET-102

JAVA.NET-106

I'll move them over to JIRA tomorrow.
What do you think about this one?

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-58
 

[Joe Walker-3]

On 4/10/07, Mike Wilson <mikewse@...> wrote:

I'm in danger of losing these so I moved them to JIRA:

JAVA.NET-97 (could you comment my suggestion?)

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-70
- As I noted before, the fix seems to breaking - but only in corner cases, so in my estimation it's safe to continue with it.

JAVA.NET-98

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-69
- Looks like an easy fix since the code is already there.

JAVA.NET-102

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-67
-  I would like to support Konq. but it's not one that I regularly test on, and getting 2.0 final done is important, so I wouldn't hold up a final release to get this in, however the fix seems fairly simple.

JAVA.NET-106

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-68
- This seems like an easy fix so it would be good to get this in 2.0 final

I've also moved from issuezilla:

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-71
- Looks like a simple fix, but I'm not sure I want to hold 2.0 back for it. What do you think?

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-72
- The issue contains full fixes and tests to it might be simple to fix, however again, I'm not sure about holding back 2.0. Your thoughts?

There are now no open issues in Issuezilla, and I've removed links from it from Getahead and used some script on the java.net site to alter the links to point at our JIRA so I'm going to ignore Issuezilla, unless anyone gets to use it by mistake.

Joe.

[mikewse]

JAVA.NET-97 (could you comment my suggestion?)

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-70
- As I noted before, the fix seems to breaking - but only in corner cases, so in my estimation it's safe to continue with it.  

I am currently doing some more thinking about the risk of breaking stuff, but so far my conclusion is people have probably avoided empty values because of the mentioned behaviour (returning the text instead) so theer shouldn't be many uses of empty values out there...

JAVA.NET-98

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-69
- Looks like an easy fix since the code is already there.

JAVA.NET-102

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-67
-  I would like to support Konq. but it's not one that I regularly test on, and getting 2.0 final done is important, so I wouldn't hold up a final release to get this in, however the fix seems fairly simple.

JAVA.NET-106

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-68
- This seems like an easy fix so it would be good to get this in 2.0 final 

Yes all these are easy fixes (that's why I put them for this week :-).

I've also moved from issuezilla:

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-71
- Looks like a simple fix, but I'm not sure I want to hold 2.0 back for it. What do you think?

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-72
- The issue contains full fixes and tests to it might be simple to fix, however again, I'm not sure about holding back 2.0. Your thoughts? 

I'll look at these and comment once I get the other stuff done.

 

Best regards

Mike

[mikewse]

JAVA.NET-97 (could you comment my suggestion?)

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-70
- As I noted before, the fix seems to breaking - but only in corner cases, so in my estimation it's safe to continue with it.

Resolved.

JAVA.NET-98

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-69
- Looks like an easy fix since the code is already there.

The supplied code refers to an old version of addRows. You refactored away this bug a long time ago, even before version 1.1 in CVS so I have just resolved it without changing anything.

Resolved.

JAVA.NET-102

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-67
-  I would like to support Konq. but it's not one that I regularly test on, and getting 2.0 final done is important, so I wouldn't hold up a final release to get this in, however the fix seems fairly simple. 

Resolved. 

JAVA.NET-106

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-68
- This seems like an easy fix so it would be good to get this in 2.0 final

After some thinking I think we may deny this one. Check my comment on JIRA and tell me what you think? (BTW: isn't JIRA sending automatic emails when issues are updated? Or only if I explicitly "watch" them?)

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-71
- Looks like a simple fix, but I'm not sure I want to hold 2.0 back for it. What do you think? 

I'm looking at it and will fix it for 2.0.

http://getahead.org/bugs/browse/DWR-72
- The issue contains full fixes and tests to it might be simple to fix, however again, I'm not sure about holding back 2.0. Your thoughts? 

This was fixed first last summer when you added the contributions and later I did some more work on it so I'm just resolving it now.

Resolved. 

 

Best regards

Mike