Hi Khalef,
khalef bessaih wrote:
>
> We have decided to go with Click web framework lately and I must say that we
> are quite impressed by the simplicity and the ease of development that the
> framework offers. The only thing that we are encountring and it is being
> raised by our web UI expert is the use of Tables for layout instead of CSS
> layouts, which we thought would be adressed in the M2 release
It is possible to create different layouts but we won't be changing
the default layout of Form as it would break existing apps.
That said we have added a BasicForm that can be laid out using CSS;
see the example below:
http://www.avoka.com/click-examples/form/contact-details.htm(looked alos ate
> the ClickClick project and I can see that you are still using Tables even for
> the GridLayout control).
>
> My question is why is it that yuo are still using those tables instaed of CSS
> layouts??
Browsers don't always support CSS very well. If you look at the above
example, you will note the conditional include for IE. :)
On the other hand Tables are supported on all browsers and using it as
a grid works out well.
What kind of problems are you guys running into with the Table layout?
kind regards
bob
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/_______________________________________________
Click-user mailing list
Click-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/click-user
