Bug#489883: Maintainer address is not deliverable.

[Daniel Burrows]

Package: tetex-ucs
Severity: serious

  When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
bounce.  The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
IMO, even if it only exists in stable.

  Daniel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  tetex-ucs@...
    SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<tetex-ucs@...>:
    host puccini.debian.org [87.106.4.56]: 550 5.1.1 <tetex-ucs@...>:
    Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <dburrows@...>
Received: from 71-217-92-155.tukw.qwest.net ([71.217.92.155]:62499 helo=[127.0.1.1])
        by algebraicthunk.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
        (Exim 4.63)
        (envelope-from <dburrows@...>)
        id 1KGDh9-0007WX-9q; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:57:27 -0700
From: Daniel Burrows <dburrows@...>
To: control@...
Cc: tetex-ucs@...
Subject: setting package to apt, reassign 489825 to tetex-ucs,
        severity of 489825 is serious ...
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:57:10 -0700
X-BTS-Version: 2.10.33
Message-ID: <1215525430-2832-bts-dburrows@...>

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
package apt
reassign 489825 tetex-ucs
severity 489825 serious
retitle 489825 Removing tetex-ucs fails (mktexlsr: command not found), breaking upgrades to texlive.

[Sven Joachim]

On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:

> Package: tetex-ucs
> Severity: serious
>
>   When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
> bounce.  The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
> IMO, even if it only exists in stable.

Even if the package does not exist at all? ;-)  You're looking for
latex-ucs, not tetex-ucs.

Sven



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Daniel Burrows]

On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@...> was heard to say:

> On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > Package: tetex-ucs
> > Severity: serious
> >
> >   When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
> > bounce.  The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
> > IMO, even if it only exists in stable.
>
> Even if the package does not exist at all? ;-)  You're looking for
> latex-ucs, not tetex-ucs.

  d'oh, sorry about that.  latex, tetex, texlive, ...

  Interesting question, though: I checked packages.debian.org and this
*does* have a real maintainer (Martin Pitt).  So maybe this is a p.d.o
bug?

  Daniel



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:34:12 +0100
with message-id <20080708143406.GB17016@...>
and subject line Re: Bug#489883: Maintainer address is not deliverable.
has caused the Debian Bug report #489883,
regarding Maintainer address is not deliverable.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@...
immediately.)


--
489883: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489883
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@... with problems

Package: tetex-ucs
Severity: serious

  When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
bounce.  The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
IMO, even if it only exists in stable.

  Daniel

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  tetex-ucs@...
    SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<tetex-ucs@...>:
    host puccini.debian.org [87.106.4.56]: 550 5.1.1 <tetex-ucs@...>:
    Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <dburrows@...>
Received: from 71-217-92-155.tukw.qwest.net ([71.217.92.155]:62499 helo=[127.0.1.1])
        by algebraicthunk.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
        (Exim 4.63)
        (envelope-from <dburrows@...>)
        id 1KGDh9-0007WX-9q; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:57:27 -0700
From: Daniel Burrows <dburrows@...>
To: control@...
Cc: tetex-ucs@...
Subject: setting package to apt, reassign 489825 to tetex-ucs,
        severity of 489825 is serious ...
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:57:10 -0700
X-BTS-Version: 2.10.33
Message-ID: <1215525430-2832-bts-dburrows@...>

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
package apt
reassign 489825 tetex-ucs
severity 489825 serious
retitle 489825 Removing tetex-ucs fails (mktexlsr: command not found), breaking upgrades to texlive.


On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:14:18AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Package: tetex-ucs
> Severity: serious
>
>   When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
> bounce.  The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
> IMO, even if it only exists in stable.

But it doesn't exist in stable, nor even oldstable. There's no record of
it in http://ftp-master.debian.org/removals-full.txt going back to 2001.

Reading the bug, it looks like you meant latex-ucs, not tetex-ucs.

Cheers,

--
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@...]

[Sven Joachim]

On 2008-07-08 16:30 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@...> was heard to say:
>> Even if the package does not exist at all? ;-)  You're looking for
>> latex-ucs, not tetex-ucs.
>
>   d'oh, sorry about that.  latex, tetex, texlive, ...
>
>   Interesting question, though: I checked packages.debian.org and this
> *does* have a real maintainer (Martin Pitt).  So maybe this is a p.d.o
> bug?

No, what I meant is: "You /should look/ for latex-ucs, not tetex-ucs".
The latter package did never exist, that's why you got the bounce.

Sven



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Colin Watson]

On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:30:09AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 04:17:48PM +0200, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@...> was heard to say:
> > On 2008-07-08 16:14 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > > Package: tetex-ucs
> > > Severity: serious
> > >
> > >   When I reassigned a bug report to tetex-ucs, I got the attached
> > > bounce.  The Maintainer address of a package ought to be deliverable
> > > IMO, even if it only exists in stable.
> >
> > Even if the package does not exist at all? ;-)  You're looking for
> > latex-ucs, not tetex-ucs.
>
>   d'oh, sorry about that.  latex, tetex, texlive, ...
>
>   Interesting question, though: I checked packages.debian.org and this
> *does* have a real maintainer (Martin Pitt).  So maybe this is a p.d.o
> bug?

http://packages.debian.org/latex-ucs shows Martin Pitt (for etch; in
later releases it's a virtual package).
http://packages.debian.org/tetex-ucs says "Sorry, your search gave no
results".

--
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson@...]



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...

[Daniel Burrows]

On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 03:50:18PM +0100, Colin Watson <cjwatson@...> was heard to say:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 07:30:09AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> >   Interesting question, though: I checked packages.debian.org and this
> > *does* have a real maintainer (Martin Pitt).  So maybe this is a p.d.o
> > bug?
>
> http://packages.debian.org/latex-ucs shows Martin Pitt (for etch; in
> later releases it's a virtual package).
> http://packages.debian.org/tetex-ucs says "Sorry, your search gave no
> results".

  Sorry about that, I was apparently emailing a little too early this
morning. :-(

  Daniel



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...