|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Bug#476126: hplip: postrm attempts to remove group scanner unconditionallyPackage: hplip
Severity: important Hi, When purged, the hplip postrm attempts to remove the scanner group, and this in an unconditional manner. Please do not do this and let libsane handle the scanner group. Thanks, JB. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24.3 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages hplip depends on: ii adduser 3.107 add and remove users and groups ii coreutils 6.10-6 The GNU core utilities ii cupsys 1.3.7-1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - pn hplip-data <none> (no description available) ii libc6 2.7-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcupsys2 1.3.7-1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii libjpeg62 6b-14 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libsane 1.0.19-4 API library for scanners ii libsnmp15 5.4.1~dfsg-6 SNMP (Simple Network Management Pr ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-8 SSL shared libraries ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-10 userspace USB programming library ii lsb-base 3.2-7 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip ii python 2.4.4-6 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-support 0.7.7 automated rebuilding support for P Versions of packages hplip recommends: ii cupsys-client 1.3.7-1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - pn hpijs <none> (no description available) pn hpijs-ppds <none> (no description available) pn hplip-gui <none> (no description available) pn openprinting-ppds <none> (no description available) pn python-reportlab <none> (no description available) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Bug#476126: Bug:#476126 hplip: postrm attempts to remove group scanner unconditionallyOn Tue, 15 Apr 2008, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> When purged, the hplip postrm attempts to remove the scanner group, and > this in an unconditional manner. > > Please do not do this and let libsane handle the scanner group. Julien, Sorry about the delay, yes I agree this would be good to resolve before lenny. hplip also checks for the scanner group and adds it if necessary. But hplip also depends on libsane. Is hplip able to rely on libsane to add and remove the scanner group as required? Looking through launchpad[1] I see that they are now using HAL rather than the scanner group for access. Is that relevant to debian? Till. Can you comment at all? Mark [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hal/+bug/195782 |
|
|
Bug#476126: Bug:#476126 hplip: postrm attempts to remove group scanner unconditionallyMark Purcell wrote:
> Sorry about the delay, yes I agree this would be good to resolve before lenny. > > hplip also checks for the scanner group and adds it if necessary. But hplip > also depends on libsane. > > Is hplip able to rely on libsane to add and remove the scanner group as > required? > If libsane manages completely that the scanner group exists throughout the whole presence of libsane, HPLIP does not need to take care of the group. If libsane does so only from a given version on, then make the dependency in HPLIP versioned. > Looking through launchpad[1] I see that they are now using HAL rather than the > scanner group for access. Is that relevant to debian? > I do not know whether Debian switched to HAL, too. If so, one could drop the scanner group even in libsane. In general I would keep the scanner group, so that the admin can add (trusted) users to the group scanner if they want to scan from an ssh login or if the machine provides desktops to remote machines through tools like VNC or NX. Till -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Bug#476126: Bug:#476126 hplip: postrm attempts to remove group scanner unconditionallyMark Purcell <msp@...> wrote:
Hi, > Is hplip able to rely on libsane to add and remove the scanner group as > required? Yes, absolutely. libsane has been using (and creating) the scanner group for years now. Also, when you create users and/or groups, you never ever remove them with the package. Users and groups must remain on the system even after the package has been purged. > Looking through launchpad[1] I see that they are now using HAL rather than the > scanner group for access. Is that relevant to debian? I provide the HAL fdi file in Debian too, but HAL is not mandatory and libsane still ships udev rules and will continue to do so. JB. -- Julien BLACHE <jblache@...> | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | <http://www.debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-request@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Bug#476126: Bug:#476126 hplip: postrm attempts to remove group scanner unconditionallyOn Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > Is hplip able to rely on libsane to add and remove the scanner group as > > required? > > Yes, absolutely. libsane has been using (and creating) the scanner > group for years now. Great, I'll remove all hplip touching the scanner group from post{inst,rm} then and defer all actions to libsane. Mark |
|
|
Bug#476126: marked as done (hplip: postrm attempts to remove group scanner unconditionally)Your message dated Thu, 3 Jul 2008 18:42:42 +1000 with message-id <200807031842.51294.msp@...> and subject line Fixed IN VERSION 2.8.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #476126, regarding hplip: postrm attempts to remove group scanner unconditionally to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@... immediately.) -- 476126: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476126 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@... with problems Package: hplip Severity: important Hi, When purged, the hplip postrm attempts to remove the scanner group, and this in an unconditional manner. Please do not do this and let libsane handle the scanner group. Thanks, JB. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24.3 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages hplip depends on: ii adduser 3.107 add and remove users and groups ii coreutils 6.10-6 The GNU core utilities ii cupsys 1.3.7-1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - pn hplip-data <none> (no description available) ii libc6 2.7-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii libcupsys2 1.3.7-1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - ii libjpeg62 6b-14 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libsane 1.0.19-4 API library for scanners ii libsnmp15 5.4.1~dfsg-6 SNMP (Simple Network Management Pr ii libssl0.9.8 0.9.8g-8 SSL shared libraries ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-10 userspace USB programming library ii lsb-base 3.2-7 Linux Standard Base 3.2 init scrip ii python 2.4.4-6 An interactive high-level object-o ii python-support 0.7.7 automated rebuilding support for P Versions of packages hplip recommends: ii cupsys-client 1.3.7-1 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) - pn hpijs <none> (no description available) pn hpijs-ppds <none> (no description available) pn hplip-gui <none> (no description available) pn openprinting-ppds <none> (no description available) pn python-reportlab <none> (no description available) Package: hplip Version: 2.8.6-1 hplip (2.8.6-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release * /usr/share/bug: run hp-check & refer inital reports to upstream LP * Refresh: debian/patches/87_move_documentation.dpatch - hp_photosmart_pro_b9100_support.dpatch * Fixed upstream: systray_applet_really_in_tray.dpatch * Remove obsolete Depends: for gs and friends -- Mark Purcell <msp@...> Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:50:45 +1000 hplip (2.8.5-2ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low * Sync new upstream release from Debian. WARNING: There were major changes applied to the hp-toolbox which introduced new bugs. Please test the toolbox and report any problem as soon as possible to the upstream bug tracker http://launchpad.net/hplip/ to get the problems fixed in the next upstream release (there will be one or two before Intrepid Feature Freeze). [ Mark Purcell ] * Stop hplip.post{rm,inst} playing with scanner group - libsane does and do not delete hplip user on purge: - postrm attempts to remove group scanner unconditionally (Closes: #476126) |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |