Hi,
We are evaluating different options for Open Source ESBs and have come across the WSO2 benchmark results, which puts Mule in a terrible position. However, we haven't been able to find any strong counter-comments from the people who develop Mule.
Therefore, we have a few questions remaining:
1) have the bugs found by the WSO2 team been repaired? How come they hadn't been encountered before running the benchmarks? They are pretty serious problems, it seems.
2) has performance been improved since the results were published?
Anyway, I would appreciate some insight as to why the Mule community has made no move to defend their product, except for the following on the benchmark page itself:
Mule configuration help?
Submitted by ciurana on July 19, 2007 - 06:23.
Hi Asankha!
Interesting results -- thanks for performing the tests.
May I ask how well do you know how to configure Mule? Some of the testing issues that you're having sound like configuration and setup issues, rather than Mule problems. Can you please post the Mule XML configuration file so that we can take a look? Please annotate the file with "objective was X, we did Y, got Z instead" comments. It may be that the configuration you have set up could be optimized.
Thanks!
E
Thanks in advance for your insights.
