BCE0088

[Nathan Stott]

I'm working on a DSL and wanted to have methods named add_(entity).
However, BCE0088 tells me that add_ prefix is reserved by the
compiler.  What naming convention to most Booers use instead of
add_(entity)?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boo Programming Language" group.
To post to this group, send email to boolang@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to boolang-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boolang
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Ayende Rahien-2]

AddFoo

You can rewrite add_foo to AddFoo using a compiler step.

Rhino DSL has a sample of this.

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Nathan Stott <nrstott@...> wrote:

I'm working on a DSL and wanted to have methods named add_(entity).
However, BCE0088 tells me that add_ prefix is reserved by the
compiler.  What naming convention to most Booers use instead of
add_(entity)?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boo Programming Language" group.
To post to this group, send email to boolang@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to boolang-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boolang
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Nathan Stott]

That's exactly what I'm doing, Ayende, but I must be doing it too
late.  On my base class I have AddFoo and I translate it from add_foo
to AddFoo in a compiler step.  However, I get that error.  I'll look
at your samples.  Changing it to create_foo with CreateFoo or
insert_foo with InsertFoo was a temporary fix, so I know my compiler
transform is working properly, it must just be too late in the
process.

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Ayende Rahien <ayende@...> wrote:

> AddFoo
> You can rewrite add_foo to AddFoo using a compiler step.
> Rhino DSL has a sample of this.
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Nathan Stott <nrstott@...> wrote:
>>
>> I'm working on a DSL and wanted to have methods named add_(entity).
>> However, BCE0088 tells me that add_ prefix is reserved by the
>> compiler.  What naming convention to most Booers use instead of
>> add_(entity)?
>>
>>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boo Programming Language" group.
To post to this group, send email to boolang@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to boolang-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boolang
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Nathan Stott]

Yeah, I had it coming too late.  Fixed it by moving it to 1 like in
your example :).


On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Nathan Stott <nrstott@...> wrote:

> That's exactly what I'm doing, Ayende, but I must be doing it too
> late.  On my base class I have AddFoo and I translate it from add_foo
> to AddFoo in a compiler step.  However, I get that error.  I'll look
> at your samples.  Changing it to create_foo with CreateFoo or
> insert_foo with InsertFoo was a temporary fix, so I know my compiler
> transform is working properly, it must just be too late in the
> process.
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Ayende Rahien <ayende@...> wrote:
>> AddFoo
>> You can rewrite add_foo to AddFoo using a compiler step.
>> Rhino DSL has a sample of this.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Nathan Stott <nrstott@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm working on a DSL and wanted to have methods named add_(entity).
>>> However, BCE0088 tells me that add_ prefix is reserved by the
>>> compiler.  What naming convention to most Booers use instead of
>>> add_(entity)?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Boo Programming Language" group.
To post to this group, send email to boolang@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to boolang-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boolang
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---