Absolute -> Relocatable

[Jinx-4]

Olin, code and schematic sent separately as two together are just a
little too big for one post

Also

RAM_START        EQU  H'0000'
START_VECTOR     EQU  H'00000'
PROG_START       EQU  H'00020'
LOW_IRQ_VECTOR   EQU  H'00018'

added to P18F2520.inc

--
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

[Olin Lathrop]

Jinx wrote:
> Olin, code and schematic sent separately as two together are just a
> little too big for one post

OK, got it.  I've got a customer deadline Friday, so I probably won't do
much with this until then.  I did take a quick peak, and this looks like a
good candidate project as a example of using relocatable mode and my
environment.  1000 is about the right length too, small enough to not be too
much work but big enough to be a meaningful example.

I'm going to take the time to not just convert it, but attempt to really
bring it into the philosophy of my development environment.  I will posts
results here when I have them, which probably won't be for a few days.


********************************************************************
Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
[phone].  Gold level PIC consultants since 2000.
--
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

[Jan-Erik Soderholm]

Olin Lathrop wrote:

> Jinx wrote:
>> Olin, code and schematic sent separately as two together are just a
>> little too big for one post
>
> OK, got it.  I've got a customer deadline Friday, so I probably won't do
> much with this until then.  I did take a quick peak, and this looks like a
> good candidate project as a example of using relocatable mode and my
> environment.  1000 is about the right length too, small enough to not be too
> much work but big enough to be a meaningful example.
>
> I'm going to take the time to not just convert it, but attempt to really
> bring it into the philosophy of my development environment.

Fine.

Then anyone can compare that with the plain-reloc-port I made and
posted just a few minutes ago (hasn't showed up on the list yet).

:-)

Jan-Erik.


--
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

[Jan-Erik Soderholm]

Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:

> Olin Lathrop wrote:
>> Jinx wrote:
>>> Olin, code and schematic sent separately as two together are just a
>>> little too big for one post
>> OK, got it.  I've got a customer deadline Friday, so I probably won't do
>> much with this until then.  I did take a quick peak, and this looks like a
>> good candidate project as a example of using relocatable mode and my
>> environment.  1000 is about the right length too, small enough to not be too
>> much work but big enough to be a meaningful example.
>>
>> I'm going to take the time to not just convert it, but attempt to really
>> bring it into the philosophy of my development environment.
>
> Fine.
>
> Then anyone can compare that with the plain-reloc-port I made and
> posted just a few minutes ago (hasn't showed up on the list yet).
>
> :-)
>
> Jan-Erik.
>

Well, *this* message arrived before the one with my ZIP'ed
reloc project. I've no idea why. It was a 47 KB attachement.
I've mailed Jinx my ZIP'ed MPLAB project privately in case
it will not make it throught the list server.

Jan-Erik.

>
--
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

[Jinx-4]

> I will posts results here when I have them, which probably won't be
> for a few days

Absolutely (or should that be relocatably) no hurry at all

If you need any info just holler


--
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

[Jinx-4]

> I will posts results here when I have them, which probably won't be
> for a few days

Absolutely (or should that be relocatably) no hurry at all. A couple of
things in it that I'll probably tidy up now I've had a think

If you need any info just holler



--
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

[Jan-Erik Soderholm]

Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:

> Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote:

> Well, *this* message arrived before the one with my ZIP'ed
> reloc project. I've no idea why. It was a 47 KB attachement.
> I've mailed Jinx my ZIP'ed MPLAB project privately in case
> it will not make it throught the list server.
>
> Jan-Erik.
>

He, *now* I know... :-)

 > "Your message was too big; please trim it to
 > less than 40 KB in size."

Anyway, Jinx has got it directly now.

Jan-Erik.
--
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

[Justin Richards]

>
> OK, got it.  I've got a customer deadline Friday, so I probably won't do
> much with this until then.

Olin (and others),

I really dont know how any of you can meet any deadlines with all the
effort you put into the Piclist and for that I thankyou all.  The
amount of effort you folks put in must far out weigh what you get out.

I spend a great deal of my spare time (and I am on holidays) just
reading the emails.

I am looking forward to the development of this thread.

Thanks Again.

Justin
--
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist