|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
A report on my recent trip to Brazil[I have put the following report on the wiki as well. It may not be
the most appropriate place, but I don't seem to have access to a Tyler Mitchell-style blog ;-) ] The second week of May I attended three different but related meetings of interest in Atibaia, Brazil (São Paulo). Here is a brief report. 1. The United Nations Global Alliance for ICT and Development launched a "Global Alliance for Enhancing Access to and Application of Scientific Data in Developing Countries," or e-SDDC for short, on May 7 <http://www.un-gaid.org/en/node/237>. Besides representatives from UN-GAID, representatives from various national science academies, research foundations, and international agencies were present. I was a "rapporteur" at the meeting. Of particular interest is the plan for a series of online courses/workshops on data management, access, and repositories. The focus is on scientific data, but open geospatial is very germane to the underlying themes of disaster mitigation, poverty reduction, and public health. It would be worthwhile keeping an eye on this initiative and look for opportunities to contribute to it in the area of geospatial data management and access. 2. The second meeting was a 3-day workshop on "Strategies for Permanent and Open Access to Scientific Information in Latin America and the Caribbean" <http://www.cria.org.br/eventos/codata2007/agenda> sponsored by the International Council of Science's (ICSU) <http://www.icsu.org/> Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) <http://www.codata.org/>. The meeting was hosted by Brazil's Centro de Referência em Informação Ambiental (CRIA). I made a presentation on geospatial data and integration with biodiversity information. I received help from several people in putting together the presentation including Ned Horning and Markus Neteler of OSGeo. I had very fruitful discussions on licensing of geospatial data with Harlan Onsrud of the University of Maine, Orono, and John Wilbanks of Science Commons. John has promised to actively work on clarifying the issue of geospatial data licensing. 3. Finally, I attended a meeting of the Inter-Academy Panel (a panel of 94 national science academies from around the world) on International Issues focusing on the use of digital knowledge resources in developing countries. Of particular interest was a focus on the science academies of Latin America and the Caribbean promoted by the Brazilian, Chinese, Indian, and the US national science academies. There is likely to be a project on access to publicly funded geospatial data in the near future. 4. After 5 days of meetings, I visited Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espacias (INPE) <http://www.inpe.br/ingles/index.php/>, the premier Brazilian National Institute for Space Research at the invitation of its Image Processing Division (DPI) in nearyby São José dos Campos. Researchers from DPI are also developing a project called TerraLib <http://www.terralib.org/>, an open source set of GIS classes and functions library written in C++. Of particular interest is a program called TerraView <http://www.dpi.inpe.br/terraview/index.php> based on TerraLib. Also open source (GPL), TerraView can be described as a more scientifically and analytically oriented ArcView. I promptly downloaded TerraView, and within minutes, with a little help from the TerraView Development Manager, I had it running under Parallels/WinXP on my MacBook Pro, and had imported Shapefiles into its own data format. A very quick program, TerraView not only works with PostGres, MySQL, and Oracle, it natively manages geographic data in a relational format using ADO. TerraLib/TerraView are successors to INPE's earlier free, but not open source, project called SPRING <http://www.dpi.inpe.br/spring/english/index.html>. Because of historical reasons, SPRING is not open source, but is available to anyone and can be used on Windows or Linux. TerraLib/TerraView are currently under more active development, and are available as true open source programs. At my suggestion, INPE will be looking into joining OSGeo. The INPE researchers are doing amazing work, and the spirit of free access to data and software seemed to permeate everyone I met. Having active involvement and backing of an institute of INPE's prestige and caliber will be very beneficial to the open geospatial community. 5. I also had a long meeting with the director of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change <http://www.iai.int/>. Promoting open geospatial software and data is directly convergent with IAI's mission of science and capacity building, but there is a general lack of understanding of the issues related to open and free access to data and software, especially at the highest levels. OSGeo can once again play a significant role by providing software, educational material, and data sets in this. I wrote the following summary in an earlier email on the edu.osgeo list. I am reproducing most of it here as it sums up my findings -- a. The scientific community as a whole wants open and permanent access to scientific data, and that includes raw research data, not just the publishable results of it; b. GeoSpatial data are a small but significant portion of the corpus of science data, so it is very important to continue to maintain an active and vocal presence in the dialong; c. A clear understanding of the licensing of geospatial data will be a big aid to everyone. Creative Commons/Science Commons has promised to help us in this; d. Following up on #c above, educating those at the highest levels in international organizations, funding agencies, and even the scientific community in the issues of open access to geospatial data and software is very important and needed; I will do my best to answer any further queries you may have. Many thanks, -- Puneet Kishor http://punkish.eidesis.org/ Ph.D. Program, Nelson Institute, UW-Madison http://www.nelson.wisc.edu/ Vice-President, Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org/ Fellow, National Academy of Sciences http://www.nationalacademies.org/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- collaborate, communicate, compete ======================================================================= _______________________________________________ Edu_discuss mailing list Edu_discuss@... http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/edu_discuss |
|
|
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] A report on my recent trip to Brazil> 4. After 5 days of meetings, I visited Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas > Espacias (INPE) <http://www.inpe.br/ingles/index.php/>, the premier > Brazilian National Institute for Space Research at the invitation of > its Image Processing Division (DPI) in nearyby São José dos Campos. > Researchers from DPI are also developing a project called TerraLib > <http://www.terralib.org/>, an open source set of GIS classes and > functions library written in C++. Of particular interest is a program > called TerraView <http://www.dpi.inpe.br/terraview/index.php> based on > TerraLib. Also open source (GPL), TerraView can be described as a more > scientifically and analytically oriented ArcView. I promptly > downloaded TerraView, and within minutes, with a little help from the > TerraView Development Manager, I had it running under Parallels/WinXP > on my MacBook Pro, and had imported Shapefiles into its own data > format. A very quick program, TerraView not only works with PostGres, > MySQL, and Oracle, it natively manages geographic data in a relational > format using ADO. TerraLib/TerraView are successors to INPE's earlier > free, but not open source, project called SPRING > <http://www.dpi.inpe.br/spring/english/index.html>. Because of > historical reasons, SPRING is not open source, but is available to > anyone and can be used on Windows or Linux. TerraLib/TerraView are > currently under more active development, and are available as true > open source programs. At my suggestion, INPE will be looking into > joining OSGeo. The INPE researchers are doing amazing work, and the > spirit of free access to data and software seemed to permeate everyone > I met. Having active involvement and backing of an institute of INPE's > prestige and caliber will be very beneficial to the open geospatial > community. by the amount of effort going in to it. I think at the time the government was employing something like over 40 people working on it. Not sure if that's still the case, but there's obviously a lot of effort. But it's frustrating because it's all parallel to the rest of our efforts. It'd be great to get them to be a part of OSGeo, but _really_ great if we get their work inter-operating with what we are doing and hopefully contributing to common software packages, and indeed having their stuff implement OGC standards. If you have contacts I'd be more than happy to help talk to them further. Chris _______________________________________________ Edu_discuss mailing list Edu_discuss@... http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/edu_discuss |
|
|
Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] A report on my recent trip to BrazilChris,
Please see my response below -- On 5/21/07, Chris Holmes <cholmes@...> wrote: > > > 4. After 5 days of meetings, I visited Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas > > Espacias (INPE) <http://www.inpe.br/ingles/index.php/>, the premier > > Brazilian National Institute for Space Research at the invitation of > > its Image Processing Division (DPI) in nearyby São José dos Campos. > > Researchers from DPI are also developing a project called TerraLib > > <http://www.terralib.org/>, an open source set of GIS classes and > > functions library written in C++. Of particular interest is a program > > called TerraView <http://www.dpi.inpe.br/terraview/index.php> based on > > TerraLib. Also open source (GPL), TerraView can be described as a more > > scientifically and analytically oriented ArcView. I promptly > > downloaded TerraView, and within minutes, with a little help from the > > TerraView Development Manager, I had it running under Parallels/WinXP > > on my MacBook Pro, and had imported Shapefiles into its own data > > format. A very quick program, TerraView not only works with PostGres, > > MySQL, and Oracle, it natively manages geographic data in a relational > > format using ADO. TerraLib/TerraView are successors to INPE's earlier > > free, but not open source, project called SPRING > > <http://www.dpi.inpe.br/spring/english/index.html>. Because of > > historical reasons, SPRING is not open source, but is available to > > anyone and can be used on Windows or Linux. TerraLib/TerraView are > > currently under more active development, and are available as true > > open source programs. At my suggestion, INPE will be looking into > > joining OSGeo. The INPE researchers are doing amazing work, and the > > spirit of free access to data and software seemed to permeate everyone > > I met. Having active involvement and backing of an institute of INPE's > > prestige and caliber will be very beneficial to the open geospatial > > community. > > I heard about this project when Iwas in Brazil, and was really impressed > by the amount of effort going in to it. I think at the time the > government was employing something like over 40 people working on it. > Not sure if that's still the case, but there's obviously a lot of > effort. But it's frustrating because it's all parallel to the rest of > our efforts. It'd be great to get them to be a part of OSGeo, but > _really_ great if we get their work inter-operating with what we are > doing and hopefully contributing to common software packages, and indeed > having their stuff implement OGC standards. If you have contacts I'd be > more than happy to help talk to them further. As I mentioned in my email above, INPE will be looking into getting more actively involved with OSGeo. I am cc-ing this email to my friend Lúbia Vinhas, the Development Manager of the TerraLib project. Lúbia was kind enough to invite me to INPE and host me while I was there. INPE might even be interested in submitting the TerraLib/TerraView project to be included under the OSGeo Foundation umbrella, but being a large, governmental institution, I am sure they will have to work within their own mandated boundaries. These are absolutely stellar folks, and any support from them will be only good for us. I hope to continue the conversation with Lúbia, and hopefully we can see their efforts be a more integral part of the OSGeo family. I know that they can immediately benefit from help with translation of documentation and tutorials, so there is much to gain for both parties. Regards, -- Puneet Kishor http://punkish.eidesis.org/ Nelson Inst. for Env. Studies, UW-Madison http://www.nelson.wisc.edu/ Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org/education/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- collaborate, communicate, compete ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ Edu_discuss mailing list Edu_discuss@... http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/edu_discuss |
| Free Forum Powered by Nabble | Forum Help |