|
View:
New views
19 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
[squeak-dev] 3.10 imageI the damien-3.10-web image size is quite large (129M) compared to a
comparably (not identical) loaded 3.9 Ramon's image (42M). Is that expected, or is it because as a beta it has not been trimmed etc.? Thanks - Sophie |
|
|
Re: [squeak-dev] 3.10 imageitsme213 wrote:
> I the damien-3.10-web image size is quite large (129M) compared to a > comparably (not identical) loaded 3.9 Ramon's image (42M). Is that expected, > or is it because as a beta it has not been trimmed etc.? > > Thanks - Sophie > > > > > new image (for your everyday work, so you have the original image intact) the new saved image is trimmed to about 34MB. Cheers |
|
|
Re: [squeak-dev] 3.10 imageOn Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez
<m.coba.m@...> wrote: > > itsme213 wrote: > > I the damien-3.10-web image size is quite large (129M) compared to a > > comparably (not identical) loaded 3.9 Ramon's image (42M). Is that expected, > > or is it because as a beta it has not been trimmed etc.? > > > > > I noted this too. But if you save the original image from Damien to a > new image (for your everyday work, so you have the original image > intact) the new saved image is trimmed to about 34MB. Can somebody help me? -- Damien Cassou |
|
|
Re: [squeak-dev] 3.10 imageOn Feb 25, 2008, at 9:23 , Damien Cassou wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez > <m.coba.m@...> wrote: >> >> itsme213 wrote: >>> I the damien-3.10-web image size is quite large (129M) compared to a >>> comparably (not identical) loaded 3.9 Ramon's image (42M). Is >>> that expected, >>> or is it because as a beta it has not been trimmed etc.? >>> >>> >> I noted this too. But if you save the original image from Damien >> to a >> new image (for your everyday work, so you have the original image >> intact) the new saved image is trimmed to about 34MB. > > I can't trimmed my image with this method... Don't know what happens. Try a different VM? - Bert - |
|
|
Re: [squeak-dev] 3.10 imageOn Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert@...> wrote:
> > > On Feb 25, 2008, at 9:23 , Damien Cassou wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez > > <m.coba.m@...> wrote: > >> > >> itsme213 wrote: > >>> I the damien-3.10-web image size is quite large (129M) compared to a > >>> comparably (not identical) loaded 3.9 Ramon's image (42M). Is > >>> that expected, > >>> or is it because as a beta it has not been trimmed etc.? > >>> > >>> > >> I noted this too. But if you save the original image from Damien > >> to a > >> new image (for your everyday work, so you have the original image > >> intact) the new saved image is trimmed to about 34MB. > > > > I can't trimmed my image with this method... Don't know what happens. > > Try a different VM? $ squeak -version 3.9-12 #2 mercredi 10 octobre 2007, 18:07:20 (UTC+0200) version 4.1.3 Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021] Linux bedous 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Oct 9 09:51:52 GMT 2007 i686 GNU/Linux default plugin location: /usr/local/lib/squeak/3.9-12/*.so Do you think I need to try another version? -- Damien Cassou |
|
|
RE: [squeak-dev] 3.10 imageTry "MCFileBasedRepository flushAllCaches" before saving 129MB -> 28.5MB !
> -----Original Message----- > From: squeak-dev-bounces@... > [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces@...]On Behalf Of > Damien Cassou > Sent: 25 February 2008 9:43 AM > To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list > Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] 3.10 image > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Bert Freudenberg > <bert@...> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 25, 2008, at 9:23 , Damien Cassou wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez > > > <m.coba.m@...> wrote: > > >> > > >> itsme213 wrote: > > >>> I the damien-3.10-web image size is quite large (129M) > compared to a > > >>> comparably (not identical) loaded 3.9 Ramon's image (42M). Is > > >>> that expected, > > >>> or is it because as a beta it has not been trimmed etc.? > > >>> > > >>> > > >> I noted this too. But if you save the original image from Damien > > >> to a > > >> new image (for your everyday work, so you have the original image > > >> intact) the new saved image is trimmed to about 34MB. > > > > > > I can't trimmed my image with this method... Don't know what happens. > > > > Try a different VM? > > Mine is pretty recent and I think I compiled it myself through subversion: > > $ squeak -version > 3.9-12 #2 mercredi 10 octobre 2007, 18:07:20 (UTC+0200) version 4.1.3 > Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021] > Linux bedous 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Oct 9 09:51:52 GMT 2007 > i686 GNU/Linux > default plugin location: /usr/local/lib/squeak/3.9-12/*.so > > Do you think I need to try another version? > > > -- > Damien Cassou > |
|
|
Re: [squeak-dev] 3.10 imageOn Feb 25, 2008, at 10:42 , Damien Cassou wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Bert Freudenberg > <bert@...> wrote: >> >> >> On Feb 25, 2008, at 9:23 , Damien Cassou wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez >>> <m.coba.m@...> wrote: >>>> >>>> itsme213 wrote: >>>>> I the damien-3.10-web image size is quite large (129M) compared >>>>> to a >>>>> comparably (not identical) loaded 3.9 Ramon's image (42M). Is >>>>> that expected, >>>>> or is it because as a beta it has not been trimmed etc.? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I noted this too. But if you save the original image from Damien >>>> to a >>>> new image (for your everyday work, so you have the original image >>>> intact) the new saved image is trimmed to about 34MB. >>> >>> I can't trimmed my image with this method... Don't know what >>> happens. >> >> Try a different VM? > > Mine is pretty recent and I think I compiled it myself through > subversion: > > $ squeak -version > 3.9-12 #2 mercredi 10 octobre 2007, 18:07:20 (UTC+0200) version 4.1.3 > Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021] > Linux bedous 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Oct 9 09:51:52 GMT 2007 > i686 GNU/Linux > default plugin location: /usr/local/lib/squeak/3.9-12/*.so > > Do you think I need to try another version? Only if your VM is somehow special and does not collect garbage when saving. If the report above by Miguel is correct (that he simply loaded and saved the image) and the same does not work for you then it certainly must be the VM. Although I think this is rather unlikely. Try emptying the MC caches and saving. - Bert - |
|
|
Re: [squeak-dev] 3.10 imageOk, future versions will be much smaller. Thanks.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert@...> wrote: > > > On Feb 25, 2008, at 10:42 , Damien Cassou wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Bert Freudenberg > > <bert@...> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Feb 25, 2008, at 9:23 , Damien Cassou wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Miguel Enrique Cobá Martínez > >>> <m.coba.m@...> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> itsme213 wrote: > >>>>> I the damien-3.10-web image size is quite large (129M) compared > >>>>> to a > >>>>> comparably (not identical) loaded 3.9 Ramon's image (42M). Is > >>>>> that expected, > >>>>> or is it because as a beta it has not been trimmed etc.? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> I noted this too. But if you save the original image from Damien > >>>> to a > >>>> new image (for your everyday work, so you have the original image > >>>> intact) the new saved image is trimmed to about 34MB. > >>> > >>> I can't trimmed my image with this method... Don't know what > >>> happens. > >> > >> Try a different VM? > > > > Mine is pretty recent and I think I compiled it myself through > > subversion: > > > > $ squeak -version > > 3.9-12 #2 mercredi 10 octobre 2007, 18:07:20 (UTC+0200) version 4.1.3 > > Squeak3.9alpha of 4 July 2005 [latest update: #7021] > > Linux bedous 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Oct 9 09:51:52 GMT 2007 > > i686 GNU/Linux > > default plugin location: /usr/local/lib/squeak/3.9-12/*.so > > > > Do you think I need to try another version? > > Only if your VM is somehow special and does not collect garbage when > saving. If the report above by Miguel is correct (that he simply > loaded and saved the image) and the same does not work for you then > it certainly must be the VM. Although I think this is rather > unlikely. Try emptying the MC caches and saving. > > - Bert - > > > > -- Damien Cassou |
|
|
RE: [squeak-dev] 3.10 image> Behalf Of Damien Cassou
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 8:07 AM > To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list > Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] 3.10 image > > Ok, future versions will be much smaller. Thanks. Here's what I run when saving a clean image, usually gets me to around 30meg with all the dev tools loaded. customGarbageCollect | tasks | tasks := OrderedCollection new add: [ EventManager cleanUp ] ; add: [ SmalltalkImage cleanUp ] ; add: [ MCMethodDefinition cleanUp ] ; add: [ MCFileBasedRepository flushAllCaches ] ; add: [ WARegistry clearAllHandlers ] ; add: [ SMSqueakMap default clearCaches ] ; add: [ Smalltalk removeEmptyMessageCategories ] ; add: [ Utilities cleanseOtherworldlySteppers ] ; add: [ Workspace allSubInstancesDo: [ : each | each setBindings: Dictionary new ] ] ; add: [ Undeclared removeUnreferencedKeys ] ; add: [ Categorizer sortAllCategories ] ; add: [ Symbol compactSymbolTable ] ; add: [ ReleaseBuilderDeveloper new fixObsoleteReferences ] ; add: [ Smalltalk garbageCollectMost ] ; yourself. Utilities informUserDuring: [ : bar | tasks do: [ : block | bar value: block printString. [ block value ] on: Error do: [ : error | Transcript show: error ; cr ] ] ]. SystemNavigation default obsoleteClasses isEmpty ifTrue: [ SmalltalkImage current saveSession ] ifFalse: [ (self confirm: 'PointerFinder on obsolete classes') ifFalse: [ ^ self ]. SystemNavigation default obsoleteClasses do: [ : each | [ PointerFinder on: each ] on: Error do: [ : error | Transcript show: error ; cr ] ] ] Ramon Leon http://onsmalltalk.com |
|
|
RE: [squeak-dev] 3.10 imageGuess we all have our own cleanup scripts ;-)
> -----Original Message----- > From: squeak-dev-bounces@... > [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces@...]On Behalf Of Ramon > Leon > Sent: 25 February 2008 4:13 PM > To: 'The general-purpose Squeak developers list' > Subject: RE: [squeak-dev] 3.10 image > > > > Behalf Of Damien Cassou > > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 8:07 AM > > To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list > > Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] 3.10 image > > > > Ok, future versions will be much smaller. Thanks. > > Here's what I run when saving a clean image, usually gets me to > around 30meg > with all the dev tools loaded. > > customGarbageCollect > | tasks | > tasks := OrderedCollection new > add: [ EventManager cleanUp ] ; > add: [ SmalltalkImage cleanUp ] ; > add: [ MCMethodDefinition cleanUp ] ; > add: [ MCFileBasedRepository flushAllCaches ] ; > add: [ WARegistry clearAllHandlers ] ; > add: [ SMSqueakMap default clearCaches ] ; > add: [ Smalltalk removeEmptyMessageCategories ] ; > add: [ Utilities cleanseOtherworldlySteppers ] ; > add: [ Workspace allSubInstancesDo: [ : each | each > setBindings: Dictionary new ] ] ; > add: [ Undeclared removeUnreferencedKeys ] ; > add: [ Categorizer sortAllCategories ] ; > add: [ Symbol compactSymbolTable ] ; > add: [ ReleaseBuilderDeveloper new fixObsoleteReferences ] ; > add: [ Smalltalk garbageCollectMost ] ; > yourself. > Utilities informUserDuring: > [ : bar | > tasks do: > [ : block | > bar value: block printString. > [ block value ] > on: Error > do: > [ : error | > Transcript > show: error ; > cr ] ] ]. > SystemNavigation default obsoleteClasses isEmpty > ifTrue: [ SmalltalkImage current saveSession ] > ifFalse: > [ (self confirm: 'PointerFinder on obsolete > classes') ifFalse: [ ^ self ]. > SystemNavigation default obsoleteClasses do: > [ : each | > [ PointerFinder on: each ] > on: Error > do: > [ : error | > Transcript > show: error ; > cr ] ] ] > > Ramon Leon > http://onsmalltalk.com > > |
|
|
Re: [squeak-dev] 3.10 imageThank you.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2@...> wrote: Guess we all have our own cleanup scripts ;-) -- Damien Cassou |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [squeak-dev] 3.10 imageDear All,
I have added some of these #cleanUp methods and SmalltalkImage current cleanUpAll. to KernelExt package in squeaksource.com/311 in the hope that they might become adopted in future images. best regards Keith |
|
|
[squeak-dev] Re: 3.10 image"Ken G. Brown" <kbrown@...> wrote in message
> By the way, I'm finding that Keith's Installer > <http://installer.pbwiki.com/Installer> is great! +1 !! |
|
|
RE: [squeak-dev] 3.10 imageHi, could someone point me to where to find ReleaseBuilderDeveloper please? Thanks, ...Stan |
|
|
Re: [squeak-dev] 3.10 image |