|
»
»
»
[s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
|
View:
New views
20 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
| < Prev | 1 - 2 | Next > |
 |
[s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by Don Brown-2
::
Rate this Message:
The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available.
No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build. Release notes: * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html Distribution: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/ Maven 2 staging repository: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/ We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging issues. Don --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by Al Sutton
::
Rate this Message:
In my view it can only be an alpha build because the S1 plugin is
incompatible with latest GA of S1 (1.3.8). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Brown" <mrdon@...> To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@...> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:12 PM Subject: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available > The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available. > > No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of > Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test > build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all > feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build. > > Release notes: > * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html > > Distribution: > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/ > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/ > > We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing > code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging > issues. > > Don > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
RE: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by Fernandes, Filipe
::
Rate this Message:
From: Don Brown [mailto:mrdon@...]
> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available. > > No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of Struts 2.1.1 > has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test build". We welcome any > comments you may have, and will take all feedback into account if a quality vote > is called for this build. I've been watching the list and I just want to say thanks for pushing through to make a build... There's issues with using the <s:form> tag. Pages seem to render fine without it... Env: RAD7, Websphere 6.1.0.5, Windows XP SP2 No issues when using Struts 2.0.11.1 The following is the error message reported on screen with devMode=true when the <s:form> tag is included... Struts Problem Report Struts has detected an unhandled exception: # Messages: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException File: com/ibm/ws/webcontainer/filter/WebAppFilterChain.java Line number: 166 filipe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
RE: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by newton.dave
::
Rate this Message:
Please post this to the struts-user list.
Dave --- "Fernandes, Filipe" <Felipe.Fernandes@...> wrote: > From: Don Brown [mailto:mrdon@...] > > The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available. > > > > No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of > Struts 2.1.1 > > has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test build". We > welcome any > > comments you may have, and will take all feedback into account if a > quality vote > > is called for this build. > > I've been watching the list and I just want to say thanks for pushing > through to make a build... > > There's issues with using the <s:form> tag. Pages seem to render fine > without it... > > Env: RAD7, Websphere 6.1.0.5, Windows XP SP2 > No issues when using Struts 2.0.11.1 > > The following is the error message reported on screen with devMode=true > when the <s:form> tag is included... > > Struts Problem Report > > Struts has detected an unhandled exception: > > # Messages: java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: > java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: > java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: > java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException > > File: com/ibm/ws/webcontainer/filter/WebAppFilterChain.java > Line number: 166 > > > filipe > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by Giovanni Azua-3
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Don,
I am also testing the 2.1.1 here ... many thanks for pushing the build. I could not find the dojo plugin in: http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/struts-2.1.1-lib.zip Then I took it from: http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/struts/struts2-dojo-plugin/2.1.1/struts2-dojo-plugin-2.1.1.jar I assume it is in sync with the zip distribution, is that correct? Many thanks in advance, Best regards, Giovanni Don Brown wrote: > The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available. > > No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of > Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test > build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all > feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build. > > Release notes: > * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html > > Distribution: > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/ > > Maven 2 staging repository: > * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/ > > We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing > code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging > issues. > > Don > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by Giovanni Azua-3
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Al,
For me as a pure 2.x user I find the fact that 2.1.1 would be hold back only as an alpha just because of supporting a backward-compatibility S1 plugin is a huge pity to say the least :) As a Struts user I personally would expect S1 plugin to have its own release cycle away from the S2 release. This way you do not affect the presumably lot of users (?) that are developing purely at level 2.x Best regards, Giovanni Al Sutton wrote: > In my view it can only be an alpha build because the S1 plugin is > incompatible with latest GA of S1 (1.3.8). > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Brown" <mrdon@...> > To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@...> > Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:12 PM > Subject: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available > > > >> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available. >> >> No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of >> Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test >> build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all >> feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build. >> >> Release notes: >> * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html >> >> Distribution: >> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/ >> >> Maven 2 staging repository: >> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/ >> >> We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing >> code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging >> issues. >> >> Don >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by Al Sutton
::
Rate this Message:
Giovanni,
Like you I am a pure 2.x developer these days, and I would have absolutely no problem with the S1 plugin being spun off into a separate project, but as things are I couldn't vote for it being anything more than a test build because we are shipping something we know doesn't work with the latest version of one of our own products. As I see it this would be like Apple making and releasing a new Speaker System today that wouldn't work with the iPod touch, or Microsoft releasing a new version of Office which isn't compatible with Vista, whilst it's true that a majority of people may not care, we know there will be those who do, and therefore we are knowingly releasing a product which won't work when people follow our own advise on setting up S1 projects. If this were any other problem then it wouldn't be such a big problem for me (e.g. I would still like the dojo plugin to be up to dojo 1.0 or spun off before a GA release, but we don't tell people to use the latest version of Dojo), but as the problems are purely of our own making then I believe we have an obligation to sort them out before saying this is anything more than a test release. Al. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Giovanni Azua" <giaz@...> To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@...> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 10:33 AM Subject: Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available > Hi Al, > > For me as a pure 2.x user I find the fact that 2.1.1 would be hold back > only as an alpha just because of supporting a backward-compatibility S1 > plugin is a huge pity to say the least :) > As a Struts user I personally would expect S1 plugin to have its own > release cycle away from the S2 release. This way you do not affect the > presumably lot of users (?) that are developing purely at level 2.x > > Best regards, > Giovanni > > Al Sutton wrote: >> In my view it can only be an alpha build because the S1 plugin is >> incompatible with latest GA of S1 (1.3.8). >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Don Brown" <mrdon@...> >> To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@...> >> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:12 PM >> Subject: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available >> >> >> >>> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available. >>> >>> No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of >>> Struts 2.1.1 has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test >>> build". We welcome any comments you may have, and will take all >>> feedback into account if a quality vote is called for this build. >>> >>> Release notes: >>> * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html >>> >>> Distribution: >>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/ >>> >>> Maven 2 staging repository: >>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.1/m2-staging-repository/ >>> >>> We appreciate the time and effort everyone has put toward contributing >>> code and documentation, posting to the mailing lists, and logging >>> issues. >>> >>> Don >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
RE: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by Fernandes, Filipe
::
Rate this Message:
From: Dave Newton
> Please post this to the struts-user list. > > Dave I should have been more clear... I'm not looking for support, just reporting a problem with the 2.1.1 build. The error I'm seeing is a result of using the 2.1.1 build using websphere while noting that I haven't had issues using 2.0.11.1 on the same platform... >> From: Don Brown [mailto:mrdon@...] >> > The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available. >> > >> > No determination as to the quality ('alpha,' 'beta,' or 'GA') of >> Struts 2.1.1 >> > has been made, and at this time it is simply a "test build". We >> welcome any >> > comments you may have, and will take all feedback into account if a >> quality vote >> > is called for this build. >> >> I've been watching the list and I just want to say thanks for pushing >> through to make a build... >> >> There's issues with using the <s:form> tag. Pages seem to render fine >> without it... >> >> Env: RAD7, Websphere 6.1.0.5, Windows XP SP2 No issues when using >> Struts 2.0.11.1 >> >> The following is the error message reported on screen with >> devMode=true when the <s:form> tag is included... >> >> Struts Problem Report >> >> Struts has detected an unhandled exception: >> >> # Messages: java.lang.RuntimeException: >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.RuntimeException: >> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException >> >> File: com/ibm/ws/webcontainer/filter/WebAppFilterChain.java >> Line number: 166 >> >> >> filipe --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by newton.dave
::
Rate this Message:
--- Al Sutton <al.sutton@...> wrote:
> As I see it this would be like Apple making and releasing a new Speaker > System today that wouldn't work with the iPod touch, or Microsoft releasing > a new version of Office which isn't compatible with Vista, It'd be more like an iPod speaker system that doesn't work with older iPods, or Microsoft shipping a version of Office that isn't compatible with an older version of Office. Which they do. FWIW I don't have an issue with the S1 plugin not supporting S1.3.8 as long as it's documented. The other comments I've seen regarding this point, however, lead me to believe it's a pretty minor fix. Is that correct? Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by matt.payne
::
Rate this Message:
My build is getting xwork 2.0.4.
This should pull xwork 2.1.x right? -->2008-04-18 10:51:15.033::WARN: failed action2-cleanup java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/opensymphony/xwork2/util/logging/LoggerFacto ry at org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.ActionContextCleanUp.<clinit>(ActionCon textCleanUp.java:68) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstruct orAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingC onstructorAccessorImpl.java:27) at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513) at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Class.java:355) at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:308)
|
|
|
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by matt.payne
::
Rate this Message:
Disregard that post.
Sorry. Matt
|
|
|
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by Al Sutton
::
Rate this Message:
Dave,
The problem is that the S1 plugin does work with older versions of S1, just not the most recent one, so it's more like if you have a video playing iPod, and it's not the most recent one, then you're OK. My problem is really that the whole point of the S1 plugin is to allow S1 code to work with S2, yet it won't work with the most recent version of S1 thats been released even the 1.3.8 has been out for over 6 months and we've been trying to get everyone to use. Al. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Newton" <newton.dave@...> To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@...> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 3:50 PM Subject: Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available > --- Al Sutton <al.sutton@...> wrote: >> As I see it this would be like Apple making and releasing a new Speaker >> System today that wouldn't work with the iPod touch, or Microsoft >> releasing >> a new version of Office which isn't compatible with Vista, > > It'd be more like an iPod speaker system that doesn't work with older > iPods, > or Microsoft shipping a version of Office that isn't compatible with an > older > version of Office. Which they do. > > FWIW I don't have an issue with the S1 plugin not supporting S1.3.8 as > long > as it's documented. The other comments I've seen regarding this point, > however, lead me to believe it's a pretty minor fix. Is that correct? > > Dave > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by Jeromy Evans - Blue Sky Minds
::
Rate this Message:
Don Brown wrote:
> The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available. > > > Release notes: > * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html > Any idea why this published Version 6 of the release notes dated 19 Feb 08 instead of Version 11 that was current at 17 Apr 08? Note the incorrect URL also. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available
by Don Brown-2
::
Rate this Message:
Whoops, that should be:
http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-211.html Don On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Jeromy Evans <jeromy.evans@...> wrote: > Don Brown wrote: > > > > > The test build of Struts 2.1.1 is available. > > > > > > > > Release notes: > > * http://struts.apache.org/2.0.11.1/docs/version-notes-211.html > > > > > > Any idea why this published Version 6 of the release notes dated 19 Feb 08 > instead of Version 11 that was current at 17 Apr 08? Note the incorrect URL > also. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@... |
|
|
Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available (test result)
by Jeromy Evans - Blue Sky Minds
::
Rate this Message:
I spent several hours migrating applications to Struts2.1.1 today. I've
applied a significant overhaul to the migration guide [1]. Summary of results: core: no new issues encountered after following the migration guide tiles 2 plugin: no new issues encountered after following migration guide sitemesh plugin: no new issues encountered, no migration required jasperreports plugin: no new issues encountered, no migration required dojo plugin: no new issues encountered after following the migration guide (only a cursory look. *see notes below) Third-party plugins: json plugin: no new issues encountered, no migration required guice plugin: no new issues encountered, no migration required Other: codebehind: in use, no new issues to report (but not migrated from any 2.0.x apps) rest: in use, no new issues to report *Dojo plugin: I only had used a small test application for this consisting of autocompleter, datetimepicker, divs and binds. I can confirm what has already been reported by others: there is an issue regarding execution of inline javascript in ajax results that may affect some users migrating from 2.0.x to 2.1.x: Inline scripts are NOT executed unless separateScripts="true" and ex |
